Federal Court of Australia
FEDERAL COURT OF AUSTRALIA
Fair Work Ombudsman v Maritime Union of Australia (No 2) [2015] FCA 814 Citation: Fair Work Ombudsman v Maritime Union of Australia (No 2) [2015] FCA 814
Parties: FAIR WORK OMBUDSMAN v MARITIME UNION OF AUSTRALIA and WILLIAM TRACEY
File number(s): WAD 136 of 2012
Judge(s): SIOPIS J
Date of judgment: 11 August 2015
Catchwords: INDUSTRIAL LAW - the respondents engaged in conduct in contravention of s 346 of the Fair Work Act 2009 (Cth) – the respondents distributed a poster which named five employees as "scabs" – penalty – where the action taken by the respondents was an act of vengeance against the employees – where action was initiated by senior officials of the first respondent – where the intention of the action was to cause emotional distress to the employees named in the poster – whether each party was entitled to make submissions as to the appropriate range of penalty – whether the Court should award compensation in respect of the emotional distress suffered by the five named employees – where the second respondent claimed penalty privilege – whether the respondents are liable to pay costs pursuant to s 570(2)(b) of the Fair Work Act.
Legislation: Fair Work Act 2009 (Cth) ss 346, 348, 539(2), 545, 545(2), 545(2)(b), 546(2), 557, 570, 570(2), 570(2)(b) Crimes Act 1914 (Cth) s 4AA Building and Construction Industry Improvement Act 2005 (Cth) s 38 Federal Court of Australia Act 1976 (Cth) s 37M
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate