Federal Court of Australia
FEDERAL COURT OF AUSTRALIA
Nichia Corporation v Arrow Electronics Australia Pty Ltd (No 2) [2015] FCA 824 Citation: Nichia Corporation v Arrow Electronics Australia Pty Ltd (No 2) [2015] FCA 824
Parties: NICHIA CORPORATION v ARROW ELECTRONICS AUSTRALIA PTY LTD ACN 065 151 626; ARROW ELECTRONICS AUSTRALIA PTY LTD ACN 065 151 626 v NICHIA CORPORATION
File number(s): NSD 558 of 2014
Judge(s): YATES J
Date of judgment: 11 August 2015
Catchwords: COSTS – applicant successful at interlocutory hearing – whether costs should be ordered to be taxed and paid forthwith
Legislation: Federal Court Rules 2011 r 40.13
Cases cited: Nichia Corporation v Arrow Electronics Australia Pty Ltd [2015] FCA 699
Date of hearing: Determined on the papers
Date of last submissions: 22 July 2015
Place: Sydney
Division: GENERAL DIVISION
Category: Catchwords
Number of paragraphs: 8
Counsel for the Applicant/Cross-Respondent: Mr SCG Burley SC with Ms CL Cochrane
Solicitor for the Applicant/Cross-Respondent: Allens
Counsel for the Respondent/Cross-Claimant: Mr RJ Webb SC with Mr HPT Bevan
Solicitor for the Respondent/Cross-Claimant: Norton Rose Fulbright Australia
IN THE FEDERAL COURT OF AUSTRALIA NEW SOUTH WALES DISTRICT REGISTRY GENERAL DIVISION NSD 558 of 2014
BETWEEN: NICHIA CORPORATION
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate