Federal Court of Australia
FEDERAL COURT OF AUSTRALIA
Mineralogy Pty Ltd v Sino Iron Pty Ltd (No 6) [2015] FCA 825 Citation: Mineralogy Pty Ltd v Sino Iron Pty Ltd (No 6) [2015] FCA 825
Parties: MINERALOGY PTY LTD ACN 010 582 680 v SINO IRON PTY LTD ACN 058 429 708, KOREAN STEEL PTY LTD ACN 058 429 600, CITIC PACIFIC LTD and CITIC PACIFIC MINING MANAGEMENT PTY LTD ACN 119 578 371; SINO IRON PTY LTD ACN 058 429 708 and KOREAN STEEL PTY LTD ACN 058 429 600; MINERALOGY PTY LTD ACN 010 582 680; ATTORNEY GENERAL FOR WESTERN AUSTRALIA
File number: WAD 110 of 2013
Judge: EDELMAN J
Date of judgment: 14 August 2015
Catchwords: ADMINISTRATIVE LAW – power of private parties to create rights inconsistent with legislative and regulatory regimes: [397]-[410] CONTRACTS – implied term of good faith – test for implication of terms – meaning and content of good faith – difference between normative guiding principles and contractual obligations – circumstances in which implication can be made – whether any scope for implication in this case: [993]-[1037] CONTRACTS – admissibility of subsequent communications between the parties for interpretation of contracts – when subsequent communications are admissible for the purpose of determining whether parties intended to be bound by the contract – relevance of subsequent communications: [716]-[749] CONTRACTS – alleged variation by subsequent contracts of contractual terms contained in formal deed – where subsequent contracts are not in the form of a deed – where subsequent contracts do not refer expressly to the term allegedly being varied – importance of context and nature of variation – where term being varied is, at best, ambiguous EQUITY – declarations and injunctions – need for proper form – improperly formulated declarations and injunctions that are abstract and not referable to concrete facts: [1043]-[1056] EQUITY – relief against forfeiture – whether relief against forfeiture is available for termination of contractual rights – whether a proprietary right is required before relief will be granted – relationship between relief against forfeiture and implied restrictions upon the exercise of a contractual discretion: [978]-[992] EQUITY – penalties – whether obligation requiring vacation of possession following termination of agreement is a penalty – meaning of a primary stipulation – meaning of a failure of a primary stipulation – when clause operates as security for primary stipulation – need for clause to be susceptible to assessment in money terms – need for detriment to be inordinate, extravagant, or oppressive: [469]-[492] ESTOPPEL – estoppel by convention – requirements for an estoppel by convention – whether estoppel by convention can apply to future rights and future conduct – test for causation and connecting links: [756]-[794] PRACTICE AND PROCEDURE – joinder of necessary parties – failure by Mineralogy to join a directly interested party, the State of Western Australia, as a party to the proceedings: [941]-[970] CONTRACTS – waiver of breaches of contract – conduct which amounts to a waiver – whether requiring breach to be remedied a month before the issue is scheduled to be determined by a court amounts to a waiver: [936]-[940]
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate