Federal Court of Australia
FEDERAL COURT OF AUSTRALIA
Marku v Minister for Justice [2015] FCA 831 Citation: Marku v Minister for Justice [2015] FCA 831
Parties: VALENTIN MARKU v MINISTER FOR JUSTICE
File number: VID 229 of 2015
Judge: KENNY J
Date of judgment: 13 August 2015
Catchwords: EXTRADITION – application for judicial review under s 39B of the Judiciary Act 1903 (Cth) – whether mandamus should issue to compel Minister to determine under s 22(2) of the Extradition Act 1988 (Cth) not to surrender applicant to Republic of Albania and to direct a magistrate or eligible judge to order his release – no refusal or failure to perform duty under s 22(2) – mandamus not available to compel Minister to reach any particular state of satisfaction under s 22(3)(e) – application dismissed. PRACTICE AND PROCEDURE – application to dispense with compliance with r 22.04 of the Federal Court Rules in relation to a Notice to Admit – application to set aside subpoena to give evidence and notices to produce – whether legitimate forensic purpose – whether reasonably likely to add to relevant evidence – subpoena set aside –notices to produce set aside (save for one paragraph).
Legislation: Judiciary Act 1903 (Cth) Extradition Act 1988 (Cth) Federal Court of Australia Act 1976 (Cth) Federal Court Rules 2011 (Cth) Constitution of the Commonwealth of Australia Extradition Treaty between the United Kingdom of Great Britain and Northern Ireland and the Albanian Republic, 22 July 1926, Tirana, [1928] ATS 6.
Cases cited: Republic of Croatia v Snedden [2010] HCA 14, 241 CLR 461 Santhirarajah v Attorney-General (Cth) [2012] FCA 940, 206 FCR 494 Marku v Republic of Albania [2013] FCAFC 51, 212 FCR 50 Yao v Secretary, Department of Education, Employment and Workplace Relations [2010] FCA 18 Trade Practice Commission v Arnotts Ltd (1989) 88 ALR 90 Comcare v John Holland Rail Pty Ltd (No 5) [2011] FCA 622, 195 FCR 43 Automotive, Food, Metals, Engineering, Printing and Kindred Industries Union v Emergency Transport Technology Pty Ltd [2011] FCA 181, 277 ALR 388 Seven Network Limited v News Limited (No 11) [2006] FCA 174 Sportsbet Pty Ltd v State of New South Wales (No 9) [2010] FCA 31 Cosco Holdings Pty Ltd v Commissioner of Taxation [1997] FCA 1504, 37 ATR 432 Snedden (aka Vasiljkovic) v Minister for Justice [2014] FCAFC 156, 315 ALR 352 Rahardja v The Governor, Long Bay Gaol [2002] NSWSC 1253 Commissioner of State Revenue v Royal Insurance Australia Ltd [1994] HCA 61, 182 CLR 51 Port Phillip Scallops Pty Ltd v Minister for Agriculture [2015] VSC 179 Soliman v University of Technology, Sydney [2012] FCAFC 146, 207 FCR 277 Bertran v Vanstone [2000] FCA 359, 173 ALR 63 CIR v Royal Insurance [1994] HCA 61, 182 CLR 51 Hala v Minister for Justice [2015] FCAFC 13 R v War Pensions Entitlement Appeal Tribunal; ex parte Bott [1933] HCA 30, 50 CLR 228 Re Australian Bank Employees Union; ex parte Citicorp Australia Ltd [1989] HCA 41, 167 CLR 513 Cuming Campbell Investments Pty Ltd v Collector of Imposts (Vic) [1938] HCA 53, 60 CLR 741 Jones v Dunkel [1959] HCA 8, 101 CLR 298 Schellenberg v Tunnel Holdings Pty Ltd [2000] HCA 18; 200 CLR 121 RailPro Services Pty Ltd v Flavel [2015] FCA 504 Neilson v Overseas Projects Corporation [2005] HCA 54, 223 CLR 331 Peniche v Vanstone [2000] FCA 1306, 101 FCR 112 Vasiljkovic v O'Connor [2010] FCA 1246, 276 ALR 326 Vasiljkovic v O'Connor (No 2) [2011] FCAFC 125 Date of hearing: 28 May 2015
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate