Federal Court of Australia
FEDERAL COURT OF AUSTRALIA
SZURL v Minister for Immigration and Border Protection [2015] FCA 864 Citation: SZURL v Minister for Immigration and Border Protection [2015] FCA 864
Appeal from: SZURL v Minister for Immigration & Anor [2015] FCCA 957
Parties: SZURL v MINISTER FOR IMMIGRATION AND BORDER PROTECTION and REFUGEE REVIEW TRIBUNAL
File number: NSD 497 of 2015
Judge: KATZMANN J
Date of judgment: 18 August 2015
Catchwords: MIGRATION – protection visa – Bangladeshi national claiming to fear persecution by reason of his political opinion – whether Refugee Review Tribunal failed to consider his claim in the light of recent country information – whether any such failure would give rise to jurisdictional error – whether Tribunal considered all his claims – late allegation of failure of Tribunal to make its own inquiries
Legislation: Migration Act 1958 (Cth), ss 5, 36, 65, 91R, 414, 415
Cases cited: Appellant S395/2002 v Minister for Immigration and Multicultural Affairs (2003) 216 CLR 473 Chan v Minister for Immigration & Ethnic Affairs (1989) 169 CLR 379 Htun v Minister for Immigration and Multicultural Affairs [2001] FCA 1802; 194 ALR 244 Minister for Aboriginal Affairs v Peko Wallsend (1986) 162 CLR 24 Minister for Immigration and Citizenship v SZIAI [2009] HCA 39; 259 ALR 429 Minister for Immigration and Ethnic Affairs v Y (unreported, Davies J, 15 May 1998) Minister for Immigration and Multicultural Affairs v Yusuf (2001) 206 CLR 323 NAHI v Minister for Immigration & Multicultural Affairs [2004] FCAFC 10 NBKT v Minister for Immigration and Multicultural Affairs (2006) 156 FCR 419 Tanji v Minister for Immigration & Multicultural Affairs [2001] FCA 1100 V v Minister for Immigration & Multicultural Affairs (1999) 92 FCR 355
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate