Federal Court of Australia
FEDERAL COURT OF AUSTRALIA
TICA Default Tenancy Control Pty Ltd v Datakatch Pty Ltd [2015] FCA 867 Citation: TICA Default Tenancy Control Pty Ltd v Datakatch Pty Ltd [2015] FCA 867
Parties: TICA DEFAULT TENANCY CONTROL PTY LTD v DATAKATCH PTY LTD, REGINALD JOSHUA, ANTHONY NOUNNIS and NATHAN PORTELLI
File number: NSD 102 of 2015
Judge: PERRAM J
Date of judgment: 14 August 2015
Legislation: Federal Court Rules 2011 (Cth) r 23.01
Cases cited: Re Saxton (decd) [1962] 1 WLR 968 cited Tyler v Thomas (2006) 150 FCR 357 cited
Date of hearing: 14 August 2015
Place: Sydney
Division: GENERAL DIVISION
Category: No Catchwords
Number of paragraphs: 4
Counsel for the Applicant: Mr K Smark SC
Solicitor for the Applicant: Tomaras Lawyers
Counsel for the Respondents: Mr B Katekar
Solicitor for the Respondents: Bartier Perry
IN THE FEDERAL COURT OF AUSTRALIA NEW SOUTH WALES DISTRICT REGISTRY GENERAL DIVISION NSD 102 of 2015
BETWEEN: TICA DEFAULT TENANCY CONTROL PTY LTD
Applicant
AND: DATAKATCH PTY LTD
First Respondent
REGINALD JOSHUA
Second Respondent
ANTHONY NOUNNIS
Third Respondent
NATHAN PORTELLI
Fourth Respondent
JUDGE: PERRAM J DATE OF ORDER: 14 AUGUST 2015 WHERE MADE: SYDNEY
THE COURT ORDERS THAT:
1. The application to appoint an expert be dismissed. 2. The costs of that application will be costs in the cause. 3. The proceeding be stood over to 19 August 2015 at 9:30am for directions. Note: Entry of orders is dealt with in Rule 39.32 of the Federal Court Rules 2011.
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate