Federal Court of Australia
FEDERAL COURT OF AUSTRALIA
SZTUU v Minister for Immigration and Border Protection [2015] FCA 886 Citation: SZTUU v Minister for Immigration and Border Protection [2015] FCA 886
Appeal from: SZTUU v Minister for Immigration & Anor [2015] FCCA 698
Parties: SZTUU v MINISTER FOR IMMIGRATION AND BORDER PROTECTION and ADMINISTRATIVE APPEALS TRIBUNAL
File number: NSD 368 of 2015
Judge: RANGIAH J
Date of judgment: 12 August 2015
Catchwords: MIGRATION – appeal from Federal Circuit Court – refusal to grant protection visa – where application to Refugee Review Tribunal decided in appellant's absence – whether any jurisdictional error – appeal dismissed
Legislation: Migration Act 1958 (Cth) ss 36(2), 426A, 426A(1), 425, 425A, 425A(3), 426A(1A)(a), 436A and 441A(4) Migration Regulations 1994 (Cth) reg 4.35D(3)
Date of hearing: 12 August 2015
Place: Sydney
Division: GENERAL DIVISION
Category: Catchwords
Number of paragraphs: 15
Counsel for the Appellant: The appellant appeared in person with the assistance of an interpreter
Counsel for the Respondents: The respondents did not appear
IN THE FEDERAL COURT OF AUSTRALIA NEW SOUTH WALES DISTRICT REGISTRY GENERAL DIVISION NSD 368 of 2015
ON APPEAL FROM THE FEDERAL CIRCUIT COURT OF AUSTRALIA
BETWEEN: SZTUU
Appellant
AND: MINISTER FOR IMMIGRATION AND BORDER PROTECTION
First Respondent
ADMINISTRATIVE APPEALS TRIBUNAL
Second Respondent
JUDGE: RANGIAH J DATE OF ORDER: 12 AUGUST 2015 WHERE MADE: SYDNEY
THE COURT ORDERS THAT:
1. The name of the second respondent be amended to "Administrative Appeals Tribunal". 2. The appeal is dismissed. 3. There be no order as to costs. Note: Entry of orders is dealt with in Rule 39.32 of the Federal Court Rules 2011.
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate