Federal Court of Australia
FEDERAL COURT OF AUSTRALIA
Taruga Gold Limited, in the matter of Taruga Gold Limited [2015] FCA 892 Citation: Taruga Gold Limited, in the matter of Taruga Gold Limited [2015] FCA 892
Parties: TARUGA GOLD LIMITED (ACN 153 868 789)
File number(s): WAD 330 of 2015
Judge(s): SIOPIS J
Date of judgment: 3 July 2015
Catchwords: CORPORATIONS – the company failed to apply to the Australian Stock Exchange for the quotation of securities within the period provided in s 723(3)(a) and s 724(1)(b)(i) of the Corporations Act 2001 (Cth) – application for relief under s 1322(4)(d) of the Corporations Act.
Legislation: Corporations Act 2001 (Cth) ss 723(3)(a), 724(1)(b)(i), 1322(4)(d), 1322(6)(c)
Cases cited: Solco Ltd, in the matter of Solco Ltd [2015] FCA 635
Date of hearing: 3 July 2015
Place: Perth
Division: GENERAL DIVISION
Category: Catchwords
Number of paragraphs: 16
Counsel for the Plaintiff: Mr J Healy
Solicitor for the Plaintiff: Kings Park Corporate Lawyers
IN THE FEDERAL COURT OF AUSTRALIA WESTERN AUSTRALIA DISTRICT REGISTRY GENERAL DIVISION WAD 330 of 2015
IN THE MATTER OF TARUGA GOLD LIMITED (ACN 153 868 789) TARUGA GOLD LIMITED (ACN 153 868 789)
Plaintiff
JUDGE: SIOPIS J DATE OF ORDER: 3 JULY 2015 WHERE MADE: PERTH
THE COURT ORDERS THAT:
1. The time for service and hearing of the application be abridged. 2. Pursuant to section 1322(4)(d) of the Corporations Act 2001 (Cth) (Act), the period of seven days referred to in sub-sections 723(3)(a) and 724(1)(b)(i) of the Act in respect of the plaintiff's prospectus lodged with the Australian Securities and Investments Commission (ASIC) on 3 June 2015 be extended to and include 6 July 2015. 3. The plaintiff is to: (a) lodge a copy of these orders with ASIC; and (b) make an announcement to the Australian Securities Exchange disclosing the terms of these orders. 4. The plaintiff and all other interested parties including ASIC have liberty to apply to revoke or vary these orders upon first giving 24 hours prior written notice. Note: Entry of orders is dealt with in Rule 39.32 of the Federal Court Rules 2011.
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate