Federal Court of Australia
FEDERAL COURT OF AUSTRALIA
Revulge v Secretary, Department of Education [2015] FCA 895 Citation: Revulge v Secretary, Department of Education [2015] FCA 895
Appeal from: Hewawasam Revulge and Secretary, Department of Education [2015] AATA 70
Parties: KAMAL HEWAWASAM REVULGE v SECRETARY, DEPARTMENT OF EDUCATION and ADMINISTRATIVE APPEALS TRIBUNAL
File number: VID 136 of 2015
Judge: JESSUP J
Date of judgment: 21 August 2015
Catchwords: PRACTICE AND PROCEDURE – Appeal of a decision of the Administrative Appeals Tribunal – Objection to competency – Appeal filed outside the prescribed time limit – Notice of Appeal did not state precise question or questions of law to be raised – Appeal dismissed as incompetent
Legislation: Acts Interpretation Act 1901 (Cth) Administrative Appeals Tribunal Act 1975 (Cth) Evidence Act 1995 (Cth) s 160 Federal Court Rules 2011
Cases cited: Minister for Aboriginal Affairs v Peko-Wallsend Ltd (1986) 162 CLR 24
Date of hearing: 9 June 2015
Date of last submissions: 7 August 2015
Place: Melbourne
Division: GENERAL DIVISION
Category: Catchwords
Number of paragraphs: 14
Counsel for the Applicant: The applicant appeared in person
Counsel for the First Respondent: D Brown of Australian Government Solicitor
Counsel for the Second Respondent: The second respondent filed a submitting notice
IN THE FEDERAL COURT OF AUSTRALIA VICTORIA DISTRICT REGISTRY GENERAL DIVISION VID 136 of 2015
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate