Federal Court of Australia
FEDERAL COURT OF AUSTRALIA
Orion Corporation v Actavis Pty Ltd [2015] FCA 909 Citation: Orion Corporation v Actavis Pty Ltd [2015] FCA 909
Parties: ORION CORPORATION AND OTHERS AS NAMED IN THE SCHEDULE v ACTAVIS PTY LTD ACN 003 854 626 AND ANOTHER AS NAMED IN THE SCHEDULE; ACTAVIS PTY LTD ACN 003 854 626 AND ANOTHER AS NAMED IN THE SCHEDULE; ORION CORPORATION AND OTHERS AS NAMED IN THE SCHEDULE
File number: NSD 2456 of 2013
Judge: RARES J
Date of judgment: 21 August 2015
Catchwords: PATENTS – whether patent invalid for failure to define invention – construction of patent – whether characteristics described in complete specification defined invention or constituted preferred embodiments – infringement – addition of integers to invention did not create a new working combination of integers to take claim beyond infringement – whether claims sufficiently clear – construction of phrase "substantial portion" – elucidation of a workable standard for skilled addressee must form part of construction of claim – whether claims fairly based on matter described in specification – description of certain embodiments in specification did not exclude those embodiments from invention merely because other embodiments described as preferable – whether claims lacked utility – whether assertion of monopoly in claims limited to useful results – determination of relevant priority date – whether claims lacked novelty compared with prior art base – skilled addressee's "background knowledge" of extrinsic matters not relevant to consideration of novelty – whether invention involved inventive step – consideration of difficulties and complications inventors faced, in determining obviousness of invention
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate