Commissioner of Taxation v Oswal (No 4) [2015] FCA 912

FEDERAL COURT OF AUSTRALIA

Commissioner of Taxation v Oswal (No 4) [2015] FCA 912 Citation: Commissioner of Taxation v Oswal (No 4) [2015] FCA 912

Parties: COMMISSIONER OF TAXATION v RADHIKA PANKAJ OSWAL and MERCURY SERVICES LIMITED

File number: WAD 264 of 2012

Judge: GILMOUR J

Date of judgment: 22 July 2015

Catchwords: PRACTICE AND PROCEDURE – pleadings – whether the reply raises a new case – whether the reply is in response to an issue raised by the defence

Legislation: Property Law Act 1969 (WA) s 89

Date of hearing: 22 July 2015

Place: Perth

Division: GENERAL DIVISION

Category: Catchwords

Number of paragraphs: 11

Counsel for the Applicant: Mr D Thomas

Solicitor for the Applicant: Australian Government Solicitor

Counsel for the First Respondent: Mr C Withers

Solicitor for the First Respondent: Kennedys

Counsel for the Second Respondent: Mr R Tassell

Solicitor for the Second Respondent: Pikes & Verekers

IN THE FEDERAL COURT OF AUSTRALIA WESTERN AUSTRALIA DISTRICT REGISTRY GENERAL DIVISION WAD 264 of 2012

BETWEEN: COMMISSIONER OF TAXATION

Applicant

AND: RADHIKA PANKAJ OSWAL and MERCURY SERVICES LIMITED

Respondents

JUDGE: GILMOUR J DATE OF ORDER: 22 JULY 2015 WHERE MADE: PERTH

THE COURT ORDERS THAT:

1. The parties are to provide a minute of proposed orders concerning additional directions that are required to be made in relation to the filing of a rejoinder, any additional evidence, any additional discovery, trial dates and any further pre-trial directions. Note: Entry of orders is dealt with in Rule 39.32 of the Federal Court Rules 2011.