Federal Court of Australia
FEDERAL COURT OF AUSTRALIA
BZAGU v Minister for Immigration and Border Protection [2015] FCA 920 Citation: BZAGU v Minister for Immigration and Border Protection [2015] FCA 920
Appeal from: BZAGU v Minister for Immigration & Anor [2015] FCCA 1278
Parties: BZAGU v MINISTER FOR IMMIGRATION AND BORDER PROTECTION and ADMINISTRATIVE APPEALS TRIBUNAL
File number: QUD 425 of 2015
Judge: LOGAN J
Date of judgment: 18 August 2015
Catchwords: MIGRATION – judicial review – procedural fairness – appeal from Federal Circuit Court dismissing application for judicial review of Refugee Review Tribunal (Tribunal) decision refusing to grant appellant protection visa – leave granted to raise ground of appeal not raised below – where appellant claimed persecution based on marriage into higher caste – appellant's evidence as to having married shortly before travelling to Australia inconsistent with much earlier date on marriage certificate which came before Tribunal after hearing – Tribunal wrote to appellant regarding inconsistency – whether Tribunal failed to comply with requirement under s 424A of the Migration Act 1958 (Cth) to give clear particulars of information considered part of reason for affirming decision under review and invite appellant to comment – what constitutes compliance with requirement – whether requirement to write to appellant in his native language
Legislation: Federal Court of Australia Act 1976 (Cth) Judiciary Act 1903 (Cth) Migration Act 1958 (Cth) ss 424A, 424AA
Cases cited: SAAP v Minister for Immigration, Multicultural and Indigenous Affairs (2005) 228 CLR 294 cited SZTGV v the Minister for Immigration and Border Protection (2015) 229 FCR 90 applied
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate