Federal Court of Australia
FEDERAL COURT OF AUSTRALIA
Mulhern v Bank of Queensland Limited (No 3) [2015] FCA 927 Citation: Mulhern v Bank of Queensland Limited (No 3) [2015] FCA 927
Parties: EMER MARIE MULHERN, JACQUELINE PATRICIA MULHERN, PINNACLE INDUSTRIES 11LLC, ANDREW QUINERT TRADING AS ANDREW Q PROPERTY MANAGEMENT, MULHERN BUILDERS LTD IRE, CELTIC PACIFIC CONTRACTORS LLIC, EMERALD HERVEY BAY DEVELOPMENTS PTY LTD, TOOWONG PRIME INVESTMENTS PTY LTD, MULHERN'S PROPERTIES INC, COUGAN CORPORATION PTY LTD and MICHAEL RICHARD MULHERN v BANK OF QUEENSLAND LIMITED ACN 009 656 740
File number: NSD 887 of 2014
Judge: GLEESON J
Date of judgment: 25 August 2015
Catchwords: PRACTICE AND PROCEDURE – whether vexatious proceedings order should be made – whether plaintiffs have frequently instituted or conducted vexatious proceedings – whether certain plaintiffs have acted in concert with persons who have frequently instituted or conducted vexatious proceedings – where applications instituted without reasonable ground – where pleadings include extravagant claims – where multiple applications made seeking identical relief – s 37AO of the Federal Court of Australia Act 1976 (Cth) applies to each of the plaintiffs – where plaintiffs unlikely to cease attempting to litigate against the defendant – where plaintiffs unlikely to restrict claims to matters based on reasonable grounds – plaintiffs ordered not to institute proceedings against the defendant without leave of the Court
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate