Federal Court of Australia
FEDERAL COURT OF AUSTRALIA
AUK15 v Minister for Immigration and Border Protection [2015] FCA 938 Citation: AUK15 v Minister for Immigration and Border Protection [2015] FCA 938
Parties: AUK15 v MINISTER FOR IMMIGRATION AND BORDER PROTECTION
File number: WAD 231 of 2015
Judge: BARKER J
Date of judgment: 28 August 2015
Catchwords: MIGRATION – Minister refused to grant protection visa on character grounds under s 501 of the Migration Act 1958 (Cth) – application for extension of time to seek judicial review – merits of the review application – Minister indicated inclined to consider grant of temporary visa under s 195A of the Migration Act 1958 (Cth) – Minister did consider the prospect of indefinite detention – Minister did not fail to give genuine and realistic consideration to merits of protection visa application
Legislation: Migration Act 1958 (Cth) s 26(3), s 36(2), s 46A(2), s 189, s 195A, s 195A(2), s 196, s 197AB, s 198, s 476A(1)(c), s 477(1), s 477(2), s 477A(1), s 477A(2), s 501, s 501(1), s 501(6)(aa) Convention relating to the Status of Refugees. Opened for signature 28 July 1951. 189 UNTS 137 (entered into force 22 April 1954)
Cases cited: Al-Kateb v Godwin (2004) 219 CLR 562; [2004] HCA 37 Ayoub v Minister for Immigration and Border Protection [2015] FCAFC 83 Brisbane South Regional Health Authority v Taylor (1996) 186 CLR 541; [1996] HCA 25 Cotterill v Minister for Immigration and Border Protection [2015] FCA 802 DZAFG v Minister for Immigration [2015] FCCA 168 Gallo v Dawson (1990) 93 ALR 479; [1990] HCA 30 Hunter Valley Developments Pty Ltd v Minister for Home Affairs and Environment (1984) 3 FCR 344; [1984] FCA 186 Jarosek v Department of Immigration [2006] FMCA 1048 Minister for Aboriginal Affairs v Peko-Wallsend Ltd (1986) 162 CLR 24 at 39; [1986] HCA 40 Minister for Immigration and Citizenship v Li (2013) 249 CLR 332; [2013] HCA 18 Minister for Immigration and Citizenship v SZJSS (2010) 243 CLR 164; [2010] HCA 48 Minister for Immigration and Multicultural and Indigenous Affairs v Huynh (2004) 139 FCR 505; [2004] FCAFC 256 MZYYO v Minister for Immigration and Citizenship (2013) 214 FCR 68; [2013] FCA 49 NBMZ v Minister for Immigration and Border Protection (2014) 220 FCR 1; [2014] FCAFC 38 NBNB v Minister for Immigration and Border Protection (2014) 220 FCR 44; [2014] FCAFC 39 Plaintiff M61/2010E v Commonwealth of Australia; Plaintiff M69/2010 v Commonwealth of Australia (2010) 243 CLR 319; [2010] HCA 41 Re Commonwealth of Australia; Ex parte Marks (2000) 177 ALR 491; [2000] HCA 67 SZSDA v Minister for Immigration and Citizenship (2012) 135 ALD 17; [2012] FCA 1319 SZTDM v Minister for Immigration [2013] FCCA 1130 Tran v Minister for Immigration and Border Protection [2014] FCA 533 WASB v Minister for Immigration and Citizenship (2013) 217 FCR 292; [2013] FCA 1016 WZANW v Minister for Immigration [2009] FMCA 1075 WZANX v Minister for Immigration [2009] FMCA 1010 WZASC v Minister for Immigration and Border Protection [2013] FCCA 1452 WZASQ v Minister for Immigration [2013] FCCA 1726
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate