Federal Court of Australia
FEDERAL COURT OF AUSTRALIA
Singh v Minister for Immigration and Border Protection [2015] FCA 971 Citation: Singh v Minister for Immigration and Border Protection [2015] FCA 971
Appeal from: Singh v Minister for Immigration & Anor [2015] FCCA 931
Parties: RAMAN DEEP SINGH v MINISTER FOR IMMIGRATION AND BORDER PROTECTION and MIGRATION REVIEW TRIBUNAL
File number: VID 188 of 2015
Judge: NORTH J
Date of judgment: 11 August 2015
Legislation: Migration Act 1958 (Cth), ss 98, 347(1)(b), 494B, 494C Migration Regulations 1994 (Cth), rr 2.16, 4.10 Cases cited: Décor Corporation Pty Ltd v Dart Industries Inc (1991) 33 FCR 397; [1991] FCA 844
Date of hearing: 11 August 2015
Place: Melbourne
Division: GENERAL DIVISION
Category: No Catchwords
Number of paragraphs: 21
Counsel for the Applicant: The applicant appeared in person.
Solicitor for the Respondents: Mr C Hibbard from Clayton Utz
IN THE FEDERAL COURT OF AUSTRALIA VICTORIA DISTRICT REGISTRY GENERAL DIVISION VID 188 of 2015
ON APPEAL FROM THE FEDERAL CIRCUIT COURT OF AUSTRALIA
BETWEEN: RAMAN DEEP SINGH
Applicant
AND: MINISTER FOR IMMIGRATION AND BORDER PROTECTION
First Respondent
MIGRATION REVIEW TRIBUNAL
Second Respondent
JUDGE: NORTH J DATE OF ORDER: 11 AUGUST 2015 WHERE MADE: MELBOURNE
THE COURT ORDERS THAT:
1. Leave to appeal against the orders made by the Federal Circuit Court on 27 March 2015 is refused. 2. The applicant to pay the first respondent's costs of the application. Note: Entry of orders is dealt with in Rule 39.32 of the Federal Court Rules 2011.
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate