Federal Court of Australia
FEDERAL COURT OF AUSTRALIA
Ashton Manufacturing Pty Ltd v Express Sign Labs Pty Ltd [2015] FCA 975 Citation: Ashton Manufacturing Pty Ltd v Express Sign Labs Pty Ltd [2015] FCA 975
Parties: ASHTON MANUFACTURING PTY LTD ACN 124 375 702 v EXPRESS SIGN LABS PTY LTD ACN 054 774 819
File number: QUD 736 of 2015
Judge: EDELMAN J
Date of judgment: 3 September 2015
Catchwords: CONSUMER LAW – interlocutory injunctions – application to restrain competitor from making allegedly false representations – lack of prima facie case – balance of convenience does not favour the grant of an interlocutory injunction
Legislation: Australian Consumer Law (Schedule 2 to the Competition and Consumer Act 2010 (Cth)) ss 18, 29(1) Federal Court Rules 2011 (Cth) Div 7.3
Cases cited: Huhtamaki Australia Ltd v Botha [2004] NSWSC 386
Date of hearing: 3 September 2015
Place: Brisbane (via video link to Adelaide)
Division: GENERAL DIVISION
Category: Catchwords
Number of paragraphs: 16
Counsel for the Prospective Applicant: Dr D Eliades
Solicitor for the Prospective Applicant: Matthew Sulman & Associates
Counsel for the Prospective Respondent: Mr A Maik
Solicitor for the Prospective Respondent: Scammell & Co
IN THE FEDERAL COURT OF AUSTRALIA QUEENSLAND DISTRICT REGISTRY GENERAL DIVISION QUD 736 of 2015
BETWEEN: ASHTON MANUFACTURING PTY LTD ACN 124 375 702
Prospective Applicant
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate