Federal Court of Australia
FEDERAL COURT OF AUSTRALIA
Sharma v Minister for Immigration and Border Protection [2015] FCA 984 Citation: Sharma v Minister for Immigration and Border Protection [2015] FCA 984
Appeal from: Sharma v Minister for Immigration & Anor [2015] FCCA 1157
Parties: NEHA SHARMA and VISHAL TRIKHA v MINISTER FOR IMMIGRATION AND BORDER PROTECTION and MIGRATION REVIEW TRIBUNAL
File number: VID 253 of 2015
Judge: NORTH J
Date of judgment: 19 August 2015
Legislation: Migration Regulations 1994 (Cth), Schedule 2, cl. 572.227
Date of hearing: 19 August 2015
Place: Melbourne
Division: GENERAL DIVISION
Category: No Catchwords
Number of paragraphs: 18
Counsel for the Appellants: The appellant appeared in person.
Solicitor for the Respondents: Ms P Mitchell of Clayton Utz
IN THE FEDERAL COURT OF AUSTRALIA VICTORIA DISTRICT REGISTRY GENERAL DIVISION VID 253 of 2015
ON APPEAL FROM THE FEDERAL CIRCUIT COURT OF AUSTRALIA
BETWEEN: NEHA SHARMA
First Appellant
VISHAL TRIKHA
Second Appellant
AND: MINISTER FOR IMMIGRATION AND BORDER PROTECTION
First Respondent
MIGRATION REVIEW TRIBUNAL
Second Respondent
JUDGE: NORTH J DATE OF ORDER: 19 AUGUST 2015 WHERE MADE: MELBOURNE
THE COURT ORDERS THAT:
1. The appeal is dismissed. 2. The appellants are to pay the first respondent's costs fixed at $4,800. Note: Entry of orders is dealt with in Rule 39.32 of the Federal Court Rules 2011.
IN THE FEDERAL COURT OF AUSTRALIA VICTORIA DISTRICT REGISTRY GENERAL DIVISION VID 253 of 2015
ON APPEAL FROM THE FEDERAL CIRCUIT COURT OF AUSTRALIA
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate