Federal Court of Australia
FEDERAL COURT OF AUSTRALIA
Hathway (Liquidator), in the matter of Tightrope Retail Pty Ltd (in liq) v Tripolitis [2015] FCA 1003 Citation: Hathway (Liquidator), in the matter of Tightrope Retail Pty Ltd (in liq) v Tripolitis [2015] FCA 1003
Parties: STEPHEN HATHWAY IN HIS CAPACITY AS LIQUIDATOR OF TIGHTROPE RETAIL PTY LIMITED (IN LIQUIDATION) (ACN 118 344 728) AND TIGHTROPE WHOLESALE PTY LIMITED (IN LIQUIDATION) (ACN 118 344 791), TIGHTROPE RETAIL PTY LIMITED (IN LIQUIDATION) (ACN 118 344 728) and TIGHTROPE WHOLESALE PTY LIMITED (IN LIQUIDATION) (ACN 118 344 791) v JOHN TRIPOLITIS, KRISTIANA TRIPOLITIS, ANNELIESE TRIPOLITIS, ROBYN TRIPOLITIS, AMTK COMPANY PTY LIMITED (ACN 165 080 133) and THE TRIPOLITIS CORPORATION PTY LIMITED (ACN 118 344 808)
File number: NSD 562 of 2015
Judge: MARKOVIC J
Date of judgment: 10 September 2015
Catchwords: PRACTICE AND PROCEDURE – Federal Court Rules 2011, r 7.33 – orders ancillary to freezing orders – cross-examination of deponents – order made requiring disclosure of assets by way of affidavit – whether leave should be granted to cross-examine deponent
Legislation: Corporations Act 2001 (Cth), s 1323 Federal Court Rules 2011, r 7.33
Cases cited: House of Spring Gardens Limited v Waite [1985] FSR 173 Kodak (Australasia) Pty Limited v Cochran (1996) (unreported, Supreme Court of NSW, Brownie J, 4 April 1996) Planet International Limited v Garcia (No. 2) [1991] 1 Qd R 426 Universal Music Australia Pty Ltd v Sharman License Holdings Ltd (2005) 228 ALR 174
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate