Federal Court of Australia
FEDERAL COURT OF AUSTRALIA
Australian Competition and Consumer Commission v Clinica Internationale Pty Ltd [2015] FCA 1006 Citation: Australian Competition and Consumer Commission v Clinica Internationale Pty Ltd [2015] FCA 1006
Parties: AUSTRALIAN COMPETITION AND CONSUMER COMMISSION v CLINICA INTERNATIONALE PTY LTD ACN 004 979 882 and RADOVAN MONTAGUE LASKI
File number: VID 252 of 2015
Judge: MORTIMER J
Date of judgment: 10 September 2015
Catchwords: PRACTICE AND PROCEDURE – variation of freezing order – appropriate to vary freezing order to allow payment of reasonable legal expenses in this proceeding and in other litigation on foot – consideration of purpose of freezing order and relevant factors including proximity to trial
Legislation: Australian Consumer Law s 224 (Competition and Consumer Act 2010 (Cth) Sch 2) Legal Profession Uniform Law s 172 (Legal Profession Uniform Law Application Act 2014 (Vic) Sch 1) Supreme Court (General Civil Procedure) Rules 2005 (Vic) r 1.17(1)
Cases cited: Cardile v LED Builders Pty Ltd [1999] HCA 18; 198 CLR 380 Deputy Commissioner of Taxation v Bollands [2012] FCA 1050; 90 ATR 679 Deputy Commissioner of Taxation v Hua Wang Bank Berhad [2010] FCA 1014; 273 ALR 194 Deputy Commissioner of Taxation v Vasiliades [2014] FCA 1250
Date of hearing: 9 September 2015
Place: Melbourne
Division: GENERAL DIVISION
Category: Catchwords
Number of paragraphs: 25
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate