Federal Court of Australia
FEDERAL COURT OF AUSTRALIA
Tait v P.T. Ltd as Trustee of the Scentre Tuggerah Trust [2015] FCA 1015 Citation: Tait v P.T. Ltd as Trustee of the Scentre Tuggerah Trust [2015] FCA 1015
Parties: ROBERT GRAHAME TAIT v P.T. LTD ACN 004 454 666 AS TRUSTEE OF THE SCENTRE TUGGERAH TRUST
File number: SAD 271 of 2015
Judge: BESANKO J
Date of judgment: 26 August 2015
Date of published reasons: 11 September 2015
Catchwords: PRACTICE AND PROCEDURE – application for an interim injunction in relation to the occupation of a shop – where the applicant was a franchisee and was evicted from shop premises after lease agreement between franchisor and the respondent was terminated – whether the applicant had made out a prima facie case – whether there was sufficient evidence to establish a prima facie case of estoppel by convention – whether the balance of convenience was in favour of the injunction being granted – where the applicant would suffer substantial prejudice if injunction not granted. Held: Application granted.
Legislation: Australian Consumer Law (Schedule 2 to the Competition and Consumer Act 2010 (Cth)) ss 21, 238 Conveyancing Act 1919 (NSW) ss 122, 129 130 Corporations Act 2001 (Cth) s 440B, Chapter 5, Part 5.3A Retail Leases Act 1994 (NSW) s 62B
Cases cited: Businessworld Computers Pty Ltd v Australian Telecommunications Commission (1988) 82 ALR 499 Con-Stan Industries of Australia Proprietary Limited v Norwich Winterthur Insurance (Australia) Limited (1986) 160 CLR 226 Ocean Dynamics Charter Pty Ltd v Hamilton Island Enterprises Limited [2015] FCA 460 Samsung Electronics Co Limited v Apple Inc (2011) 217 FCR 238; [2011] FCAFC 156 TEC Desert Pty Ltd and Another v Commissioner of State Revenue (Western Australia) (2010) 241 CLR 576
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate