Federal Court of Australia
FEDERAL COURT OF AUSTRALIA
Le v Minister for Immigration and Border Protection [2015] FCA 1018 Citation: Le v Minister for Immigration and Border Protection [2015] FCA 1018
Parties: VAN LINH LE v MINISTER FOR IMMIGRATION AND BORDER PROTECTION
File number: QUD 554 of 2014
Judge: RANGIAH J
Date of judgment: 16 September 2015
Catchwords: MIGRATION – Minister's decision to cancel visa – where applicant failed character test – whether Minister failed to take into account relevant consideration – where applicant had lost Vietnamese nationality – where applicant would face indefinite detention – failure to take into account legal consequence of decision – jurisdictional error – application allowed
Legislation: Migration Act 1958 (Cth) ss 195, 195A, 476A(1)(c), 501(2), 501(6), 501(7) and 501(7)(c)
Cases cited: Al-Kateb v Godwin (2004) 219 CLR 562 cited Dranichnikov v Minister for Immigration and Multicultural Affairs (2003) 197 ALR 389 cited Foster v Minister for Customs and Justice (2000) 200 CLR 442 cited Khan v Minister for Immigration and Ethnic Affairs (1987) 14 ALD 291 cited Minister for Immigration and Citizenship v SZJSS [2010] HCA 48; 243 CLR 164 cited Minister for Immigration and Multicultural Affairs v Yusuf (2001) 206 CLR 323 cited Minister for Immigration and Multicultural and Indigenous Affairs v Huynh (2004) 139 FCR 505 applied Moana v Minister for Immigration and Border Protection [2015] FCAFC 54 considered NBMZ v Minister for Immigration and Border Protection (2014) 220 FCR 1 applied NBNB v Minister for Immigration and Border Protection (2014) 220 FCR 44 applied Swift v SAS Trustee Corporation [2010] NSWCA 182 cited
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate