Federal Court of Australia
FEDERAL COURT OF AUSTRALIA
Nadarajapillai v Naderasa [2015] FCA 1022 Citation: Nadarajapillai v Naderasa [2015] FCA 1022
Parties: PIRAPAKARAN NADARAJAPILLAI v RAVINDRAN NADERASA
File number: NSD 923 of 2015
Judge: MARKOVIC J
Date of judgment: 15 September 2015
Catchwords: BANKRUPTCY AND INSOLVENCY – stay of sequestration order sought under r 36.08 of the Federal Court Rules 2011 – consideration of relevant principles – arguable point – balance of convenience – bankrupt able to prosecute appeal – balance of convenience not supportive of a stay – stay application dismissed
Legislation: Bankruptcy Act 1966 (Cth) ss 5, 37(2)(a), 52(3), 58(1), 60(2), 178 Federal Court Rules 2011 r 36.08
Cases cited: Endresz v Australian Securities and Investment Commission [2014] FCA 1139 followed Kellow v Dudzinski [2003] FCA 238 followed Nolten v Groeneveld Australia Pty Ltd [2011] FCA 1494 followed Powerflex Services Pty Ltd v Data Access Corporation (1996) 67 FCR 65 followed
Date of hearing: 7 September 2015
Place: Sydney
Division: GENERAL DIVISION
Category: Catchwords
Number of paragraphs: 24
Solicitor for the Applicant: Mr J M Patel
Solicitor for the Respondent: Mr M Campbell of Mark Campbell & Co
IN THE FEDERAL COURT OF AUSTRALIA NEW SOUTH WALES DISTRICT REGISTRY GENERAL DIVISION NSD 923 of 2015
BETWEEN: PIRAPAKARAN NADARAJAPILLAI
Applicant
AND: RAVINDRAN NADERASA
Respondent
JUDGE: MARKOVIC J DATE OF ORDER: 15 SEPTEMBER 2015 WHERE MADE: SYDNEY
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate