Federal Court of Australia
FEDERAL COURT OF AUSTRALIA
Gaffey v Comcare [2015] FCA 1024 Citation: Gaffey v Comcare [2015] FCA 1024
Appeal from: Gaffey v Comcare [2014] AATA 659
Parties: PRUDENCE GAFFEY v COMCARE
File number: ACD 98 of 2014
Judge: WIGNEY J
Date of judgment: 15 September 2015
Catchwords: ADMINISTRATIVE LAW – appeal from the Administrative Appeals Tribunal – review of a decision to disallow a compensation claim – whether the Administrative Appeals Tribunal made an error of law in its review of a compensation claim – whether the Administrative Appeals Tribunal made an error of law in determining a major depressive disorder as an injury under s 5A of the Safety, Rehabilitation and Compensation Act 1988 (Cth) – whether the Administrative Appeals Tribunal erred in law in determining the date of injury – whether injury was a result of reasonable administrative action taken in a reasonable manner in respect of employee's employment pursuant to s 5A(1) of the Safety, Rehabilitation and Compensation Act 1988 (Cth)
Legislation: Administrative Appeals Tribunal Act 1975 (Cth), s 44 Federal Court Rules 2011 (Cth), r 33.12 Safety, Rehabilitation and Compensation Act 1988 (Cth), ss 4, 5, 5A, 5B, 7(4), 14
Cases cited: Comcare v Mooi (1996) 69 FCR 439 Commissioner for Australian Capital Territory Revenue v Alphaone Pty Ltd (1994) 49 FCR 576 Federal Commissioner of Taxation v Raptis (1989) 20 ATR 1262; 19 ALD 726 Haritos v Commissioner of Taxation [2015] FCAFC 92 Kennedy Cleaning Services Pty Limited v Petkoska (2000) 200 CLR 286 Smith v Comcare (2013) 212 FCR 335 Zickar v MGH Plastic Industries Pty Limited (1996) 187 CLR 310
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate