Federal Court of Australia
FEDERAL COURT OF AUSTRALIA
Asden Developments Pty Ltd (in liq) v Dinoris (No 2) [2015] FCA 1025 Citation: Asden Developments Pty Ltd (in liq) v Dinoris (No 2) [2015] FCA 1025
Parties: ASDEN DEVELOPMENTS PTY LTD (IN LIQUIDATION) ACN 115 851 833 v PETER DINORIS and NICK COMBIS
File number: QUD 578 of 2014
Judge: REEVES J
Date of judgment: 8 September 2015
Catchwords: PRACTICE AND PROCEDURE – evidence – exception to the hearsay rule in s 69 of the Evidence Act 1995 (Cth) – business records exception – whether invoice is a business record in the circumstances – whether discretion should be exercised under s 135 of the Evidence Act
Legislation: Evidence Act 1995 (Cth)
Cases cited: Australian Competition and Consumer Commission v Air New Zealand Ltd (No 1) (2012) 207 FCR 448; [2012] FCA 1355 Tasmania v Tu Ai Lin (2011) 225 A Crim R 1; [2011] TASSC 54 Odgers S, Uniform Evidence Law (10th ed, Thomson Reuters, 2012)
Date of hearing: 8 September 2015
Place: Brisbane
Division: general division
Category: Catchwords
Number of paragraphs: 19
Counsel for the Applicant: Mr M Martin QC
Solicitor for the Applicant: Mills Oakley Lawyers
Counsel for the First and Second Respondents: Mr I Erskine
Solicitor for the First and Second Respondents: HBM Lawyers
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate