Federal Court of Australia
FEDERAL COURT OF AUSTRALIA
Wotton v State of Queensland (No 2) [2015] FCA 1073 Citation: Wotton v State of Queensland (No 2) [2015] FCA 1073
Parties: LEX PATRICK WOTTON, AGNES WOTTON and CECILIA ANNE WOTTON v STATE OF QUEENSLAND and COMMISSIONER OF THE POLICE SERVICE WHO IS SUED AS THE COMMISSIONER OF THE POLICE SERVICE AND AS REPRESENTING THE MEMBERS OF THE QUEENSLAND POLICE SERVICE ENGAGED IN THE IMPUGNED CONDUCT
File number: QUD 535 of 2013
Judge: MORTIMER J
Date of judgment: 23 September 2015
Catchwords: EVIDENCE – objections to admissibility of expert evidence on the basis of relevance – objections overruled
Legislation: Evidence Act 1995 (Cth) ss 55, 56
Date of hearing: 23 September 2015
Place: Palm Island
Division: GENERAL DIVISION
Category: Catchwords
Number of paragraphs: 12
Counsel for the applicants: Ms C Ronalds SC with Mr J Creamer and Ms S Pointing
Solicitor for the applicants: Levitt Robinson Solicitors
Counsel for the respondents: Mr M Hinson QC with Mr S McLeod and Mr S Forrest
Solicitor for the respondents: Crown Law Queensland
IN THE FEDERAL COURT OF AUSTRALIA QUEENSLAND DISTRICT REGISTRY GENERAL DIVISION QUD 535 of 2013
BETWEEN: LEX PATRICK WOTTON
First Applicant
AGNES WOTTON
Second Applicant
CECILIA ANNE WOTTON
Third Applicant
AND: STATE OF QUEENSLAND
First Respondent
COMMISSIONER OF THE POLICE SERVICE WHO IS SUED AS THE COMMISSIONER OF THE POLICE SERVICE AND AS REPRESENTING THE MEMBERS OF THE QUEENSLAND POLICE SERVICE ENGAGED IN THE IMPUGNED CONDUCT
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate