Federal Court of Australia
FEDERAL COURT OF AUSTRALIA
Basetec Services Pty Ltd v Leighton Contractors Pty Ltd (No 4) [2015] FCA 1093 Citation: Basetec Services Pty Ltd v Leighton Contractors Pty Ltd (No 4) [2015] FCA 1093
Parties: BASETEC SERVICES PTY LTD ABN 30 086 798 361 v LEIGHTON CONTRACTORS PTY LTD ABN 98 000 893 667
File number: SAD 84 of 2014
Judge: BESANKO J
Date of judgment: 13 October 2015
Catchwords: PRACTICE AND PROCEDURE – application for further security for costs – whether there was reason to believe the applicant would be unable to pay the respondent's costs – where the applicant had provided security, had cash 'reserves' and had an undrawn overdraft facility – where trial to take place within two months – Corporations Act 2001 (Cth) s 1335. Held: Application dismissed.
Legislation: Corporations Act 2001 (Cth) s 1335
Cases cited: Basetec Services Pty Ltd v Leighton Contractors Pty Ltd [2014] FCA 991 Coca-Cola Amatil Victoria Ltd v PAA Enterprises Pty Ltd [2003] VSCA 135 Mecrus Pty Ltd v Industrial Energy Pty Ltd [2015] FCA 103
Date of hearing: 2 October 2015
Place: Adelaide
Division: GENERAL DIVISION
Category: Catchwords
Number of paragraphs: 15
Counsel for the Applicant/Cross-Respondent: Mr RJ Whitington QC with Mr B Jenner
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate