Federal Court of Australia
FEDERAL COURT OF AUSTRALIA
Australian Securities and Investments Commission v Ostrava Equities Pty Ltd [2015] FCA 1112 Citation: Australian Securities and Investments Commission v Ostrava Equities Pty Ltd [2015] FCA 1112
Parties: AUSTRALIAN SECURITIES AND INVESTMENTS COMMISSION v OSTRAVA EQUITIES PTY LTD, OSTRAVA ASSET MANAGEMENT PTY LTD, OSTRAVA SECURITIES PTY LTD, VANESSA MARIA ASH and BRADLEY JOHN GRIMM
File number: VID 201 of 2015
Judge: DAVIES J
Date of judgment: 23 October 2015
Catchwords: COSTS – where orders made under s 1323 of the Corporations Act 2001 (Cth) against the defendants – where orders made without power and subsequently discharged – application by defendants for certain costs of application under s 1323 on an indemnity basis – relevant principles – costs order made on the party-party basis
Legislation: Corporations Act 2001 (Cth) ss 1323, 1335(2) Federal Court of Australia Act 1976 (Cth) s 37M Federal Court Rules 2011 (Cth) r 40.02
Cases cited: Colgate-Palmolive Company v Cussons Pty Limited (1993) 46 FCR 225; [1993] FCA 801 Seven Network Ltd v News Ltd (2009) 182 FCR 160; [2009] FCAFC 166 Hamod v New South Wales [2002] FCA 424 Australian Securities and Investments Commission v Carey (No 14) (2007) 158 FCR 92; [2007] FCA 310
Date of hearing: 24 August 2015
Place: Melbourne
Division: GENERAL DIVISION
Category: Catchwords
Number of paragraphs: 16
Counsel for the Plaintiff: J P Moore QC with C Van Proctor
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate