Federal Court of Australia
FEDERAL COURT OF AUSTRALIA
Interleasing (Australia) Limited v Tieman Industries (in liq) [2015] FCA 1120 Citation: Interleasing (Australia) Limited v Tieman Industries (in liq) [2015] FCA 1120
Parties: INTERLEASING (AUSTRALIA) LIMITED ACN 008 589 562 v TIEMAN INDUSTRIES PTY LTD (IN LIQUIDATION) ACN 004 517 953, SEBASTIAN DAVID HAMS, RAHUL GOYAL AND BRYAN WEBSTER IN THEIR CAPACITIES AS THE JOINT AND SEVERAL LIQUIDATORS (FORMERLY THE JOINT AND SEVERAL ADMINISTRATORS) OF TIEMAN INDUSTRIES PTY LTD (IN LIQUIDATION) ACN 004 517 953, WASTECH FIELD SERVICE PTY LTD ACN 607 776 894 AS TRUSTEE FOR THE WASTECH FIELD SERVICE TRUST ABN 81 494 136 790, THIRD ZETON PTY LTD ACN 607 463 972 and THIRD ZETON IP PTY LTD ACN 607 861 227
File number: NSD 1158 of 2015
Judge: GLEESON J
Date of judgment: 22 October 2015
Catchwords: CORPORATIONS – application for leave to proceed pursuant to Corporations Act 2001 (Cth), s 500(2) – where case involves proprietary claim – leave granted PRACTICE AND PROCEDURE – whether proceeding should be transferred to Victorian District Registry – where applicant's primary place of business in New South Wales – where convenience of applicant and respondents point in different directions – circumstances do not warrant a transfer of proceeding
Legislation: Corporations Act 2001 (Cth), s 500(2) Federal Court of Australia Act 1976 (Cth), s 48 Federal Court Rules 2011 (Cth), r 2.02 Personal Property Securities Act 2009 (Cth)
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate