Federal Court of Australia
FEDERAL COURT OF AUSTRALIA
Oswal v Commissioner of Taxation (No 2) [2015] FCA 1143 Citation: Oswal v Commissioner of Taxation (No 2) [2015] FCA 1143
Parties: RADHIKA PANKAJ OSWAL v COMMISSIONER OF TAXATION FOR THE COMMONWEALTH OF AUSTRALIA
File number: NSD 850 of 2012
Parties: PANKAJ OSWAL v COMMISSIONER OF TAXATION FOR THE COMMONWEALTH OF AUSTRALIA
File number: NSD 851 of 2012
Parties: PANKAJ OSWAL AS TRUSTEE OF THE BURRUP TRUST v COMMISSIONER OF TAXATION FOR THE COMMONWEALTH OF AUSTRALIA
File number: NSD 852 of 2012
Judge: NICHOLAS J
Date of judgment: 5 November 2015
Catchwords: PRACTICE AND PROCEDURE – security for costs –applicants commenced proceedings under Part IVC of the Taxation Administration Act 1953 (Cth) challenging tax assessments by respondent – where applicants natural persons – where applicants ordinarily resident overseas – where applicants entered into litigation funding agreements in relation to various proceedings including the Part IVC proceedings – where applicants mortgaged or assigned or purported to mortgage or assign assets to litigation funder – whether applicants should be required to provide security for respondent's costs – whether court has power to make such an order in Part IVC proceedings – relevant considerations – orders made requiring applicants to provide security for respondent's costs
Legislation: Administrative Appeals Tribunal Act 1975 (Cth) s 44(1) Companies (Victoria) Code s 533(1) Federal Court of Australia Act 1976 (Cth) s 56 Federal Court Rules 1979 (Cth) O 53, r 8 Federal Court Rules 2011 (Cth) r 19.01 Foreign Judgments (Reciprocal Enforcement) Act 1933 (UK) Foreign Judgments Regulations 1992 (Cth) Income Tax Assessment Act 1936 (Cth) s 177(1) Judiciary Act 1903 (Cth) 78B Taxation Administration Act 1953 (Cth) Part IVC, s 14ZZ
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate