Federal Court of Australia
FEDERAL COURT OF AUSTRALIA
Spence v Rigging Rentals WA Pty Ltd [2015] FCA 1158 Citation: Spence v Rigging Rentals WA Pty Ltd [2015] FCA 1158
Parties: ERIC MYLES JOHN SPENCE v RIGGING RENTALS WA PTY LTD (ACN 105 556 563), CLIFFORD MCGILLIVRAY and CRAIG SWEETAPPLE
File number: WAD 301 of 2014
Judge: GILMOUR J
Date of judgment: 29 October 2015
Catchwords: CORPORATIONS - oppressive conduct under s 232 of the Corporations Act 2001 (Cth) - proposed sale of the first defendant – condition in email sent to the plaintiff concerning the issue of additional shares to the second and third defendants and the proposed sale - claims against the plaintiff for misconduct in relation to the affairs of the first defendant - whether the condition amounts to oppressive conduct - second and third defendants achieving a personal benefit although claims against the plaintiff are claims of the first defendant. CORPORATIONS - cross-claim for breach of directors' duties under s 182 of the Corporations Act 2001 (Cth) and breach of fiduciary duties - disputed expenses charged to the cross-claimant's account - alleged excessive remuneration payments to the bookkeeper - receipt of director's fees from companies that allegedly placed the cross-respondent in a position of conflict - expenses and lost profits. EVIDENCE - admissibility of email under the Evidence Act 1995 (Cth) - whether s 131 of the Evidence Act applies - classification of the dispute that is the subject of the email communication.
Legislation: Corporations Act 2001 (Cth) ss 182(1), 232, 233, 234, 1317H Evidence Act 1995 (Cth) s 131 Long Service Leave Act 1958 (WA) s 8(3)
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate