Federal Court of Australia
FEDERAL COURT OF AUSTRALIA
AIY15 v Minister for Immigration and Border Protection [2015] FCA 1180 Citation: AIY15 v Minister for Immigration and Border Protection [2015] FCA 1180
Appeal from: AIY15 v Minister for Immigration & Anor [2015] FCCA 1571
Parties: AIY15 v MINISTER FOR IMMIGRATION AND BORDER PROTECTION and ADMINISTRATIVE APPEALS TRIBUNAL
File number: NSD 749 of 2015
Judge: PERRY J
Date of judgment: 4 November 2015
Catchwords: MIGRATION - appeal against Federal Circuit Court decision refusing application for judicial review of decision by Refugee Review Tribunal – whether primary judge failed to find that the Tribunal fell into jurisdictional error in failing to consider whether there was a real risk that the appellant would suffer degrading treatment or punishment constituting "significant harm" by reason of the enactment of the Sri Lankan Immigrants and Emigrants Act – where argument was not articulated by appellant before the Tribunal or delegate – where no obligation upon Tribunal to consider whether the Immigrants and Emigrants Act amounts to an "act" for the purposes of s 36(2A)(e) of the Migration Act 1958 (Cth) (the Act) – where primary judge erred in conflating criteria under ss 36(2)(a) and 36(2)(aa) of the Act but no equivalent error was made by the Tribunal
Legislation: Migration Act 1958 (Cth), ss 5(1), 36, 414, 476 Convention relating to the Status of Refugees, opened for signature 28 July 1951, 189 UNTS 137, [1954] ATS 5 (entered into force 22 April 1954) Protocol relating to the Status of Refugees, opened for signature 31 January 1967, 606 UNTS 267, [1973] ATS 37 (entered into force 4 October 1967)
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate