Federal Court of Australia
FEDERAL COURT OF AUSTRALIA
Cameron v Secretary, Department of Human Services (No 2) [2015] FCA 1201 Citation: Cameron v Secretary, Department of Human Services (No 2) [2015] FCA 1201
Appeal from: Cameron v Secretary, Department of Human Services [2015] AATA 62
Parties: DONALD CAMERON v SECRETARY, DEPARTMENT OF HUMAN SERVICES
File number(s): NSD 163 of 2015
Judge(s): YATES J
Date of judgment: 6 November 2015
Catchwords: PRACTICE AND PROCEDURE – application for lump sum costs – application granted
Legislation: Federal Court Rules 2011 r 40.02
Cases cited: Cameron v Secretary, Department of Human Services [2015] FCA 875 Nine Films & Television Pty Limited v Ninox Television Limited [2006] FCA 1046
Date of hearing: 6 November 2015
Place: Sydney
Division: GENERAL DIVISION
Category: Catchwords
Number of paragraphs: 10
Counsel for the Applicant: The applicant did not appear
Solicitor for the Respondent: Dr S Thompson of Sparke Helmore Lawyers
IN THE FEDERAL COURT OF AUSTRALIA NEW SOUTH WALES DISTRICT REGISTRY GENERAL DIVISION NSD 163 of 2015
ON APPEAL FROM THE ADMINISTRATIVE APPEALS TRIBUNAL
BETWEEN: DONALD CAMERON
Applicant
AND: SECRETARY, DEPARTMENT OF HUMAN SERVICES
Respondent
JUDGE: YATES J DATE OF ORDER: 6 NOVEMBER 2015 WHERE MADE: SYDNEY
THE COURT ORDERS THAT:
1. Pursuant to r 40.02(b) of the Federal Court Rules 2011 (the Rules), costs be awarded in a lump sum in the amount of $6500.00 instead of any taxed costs, for work up to 19 August 2015. 2. The applicant pay the respondent's costs of applying for lump sum costs. 3. Pursuant to r 40.02(b) of the Rules, costs be awarded in a lump sum in the amount of $1955.00 instead of any taxed costs, for work since 19 August 2015. Note: Entry of orders is dealt with in Rule 39.32 of the Federal Court Rules 2011.
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate