Federal Court of Australia
FEDERAL COURT OF AUSTRALIA
Knott Investments Pty Ltd v Winnebago Industries, Inc (No 2) [2015] FCA 1214 Citation: Knott Investments Pty Ltd v Winnebago Industries, Inc (No 2) [2015] FCA 1214
Parties: KNOTT INVESTMENTS PTY LTD v WINNEBAGO INDUSTRIES, INC, WINNEBAGO OF INDIANA, LLC, WINNEBAGO RV PTY LTD (ACN 169 971 760), APOLLO MOTORHOME HOLIDAYS PTY LTD (ACN 051 584 153) and BARMIL ENTERPRISES PTY LTD (ACN 121 841 405)
File number(s): NSD 907 of 2014
Judge(s): YATES J
Date of judgment: 11 November 2015
Catchwords: PRACTICE AND PROCEDURE – application to amend originating application and statement of claim – application refused
Legislation: Competition and Consumer Act 2010 (Cth) Sch 2 Federal Court Rules 2011 r 16.02
Cases cited: Fencott v Muller (1983) 152 CLR 570 Forrest v Australian Securities and Investments Commission (2012) 247 CLR 486 Rural Press Limited v Australian Competition and Consumer Commission (2003) 216 CLR 53
Date of hearing: 23 October 2015, 5 November 2015
Place: Sydney
Division: GENERAL DIVISION
Category: Catchwords
Number of paragraphs: 54
Counsel for the Applicant: Mr PW Flynn
Solicitor for the Applicant: King & Wood Mallesons
Counsel for the Respondents: Mr M Darke SC with Mr A Shearer
Solicitor for the Respondents: Corrs Chambers Westgarth
IN THE FEDERAL COURT OF AUSTRALIA NEW SOUTH WALES DISTRICT REGISTRY GENERAL DIVISION NSD 907 of 2014
BETWEEN: KNOTT INVESTMENTS PTY LTD
Applicant
AND: WINNEBAGO INDUSTRIES, INC
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate