Federal Court of Australia
FEDERAL COURT OF AUSTRALIA
Tameeka Group Pty Limited v Landan Pty Limited [2015] FCA 1218 Citation: Tameeka Group Pty Limited v Landan Pty Limited [2015] FCA 1218
Parties: TAMEEKA GROUP PTY LIMITED (ACN 120 830 819) and 2444 ON THE GREEN PTY LTD (ACN 606 425 389) v LANDAN PTY LIMITED (ACN 109 801 229), GRAN-DIA INVESTMENTS PTY LIMITED (ACN 000 790 223), MALCOLM CORBETT and DIANE MAREE PRESTON
File number: NSD 969 of 2015
Judge: MARKOVIC J
Date of judgment: 11 November 2015
Catchwords: PRACTICE AND PROCEDURE – application for stay pending filing of proceedings in another jurisdiction – application to strike out parts of applicants' statement of claim – further or in the alternative, application for further and better particulars – whether parts of applicants' statement of claim is evasive or ambiguous or likely to cause prejudice, embarrassment or delay in the proceeding HIGH COURT AND FEDERAL COURT – cross-vesting – power of Federal Court to transfer proceeding to State Supreme Court – appropriate forum where same issues to be determined – interests of justice criterion
Legislation: Competition and Consumer Act 2010 (Cth) (Australian Consumer Law) Sch 2, ss 21, 23 Jurisdiction of Courts (Cross-vesting) Act 1987 (Cth) s 5(4) Corporations Act 2001 (Cth) s 568A Civil Dispute Resolution Act 2011 (Cth) Real Property Act 1900 (NSW) s 74MA Federal Court Rules 2011 rr 16.21(1)(c), (d), (e), 16.43, 16.45
Cases cited: Australian Competition & Consumer Commission v Pauls Ltd (2000) ATPR 41-747 Australian Competition and Consumer Commission v Allphones Retail Pty Ltd (2009) 253 ALR 324 BHP Billiton Ltd v Schultz (2004) 221 CLR 400 Commonwealth Bank of Australia v Dalle Cort [2014] QSC 296 Danthanarayana v Commonwealth of Australia [2014] FCA 552 Elston v Commonwealth of Australia [2013] FCA 108 Fair Work Ombudsman v Eastern Colour Pty Ltd (2011) 209 IR 263 General Steel Industries Inc v Commissioner for Railways (NSW) (1964) 112 CLR 125 Macquarie Bank Ltd v Juno Holdings S.a.r.l. [2015] NSWSC 919 McKernan v Fraser (1931) 46 CLR 343 Monroe Topple & Associates Pty Ltd v Institute of Chartered Accountants in Australia (2002) 122 FCR 110 Oswal v Burrup Fertilisers Pty Limited (Recs and Mgrs apptd) (2011) 85 ACSR 531 Polar Aviation Pty Limited v Civil Aviation Safety Authority (2012) 203 FCR 325 Power Infrastructure Pty Ltd v Downer EDI Engineering Power Pty Ltd (No 3) [2011] FCA 539 Spiteri v Nine Network Australia Pty Ltd [2008] FCA 905 Sterling Pharmaceuticals Pty Limited v The Boots Company (Australia) Pty Limited (1992) 34 FCR 287 Tonto Home Loans Australia Pty Ltd v Tavares [2011] NSWCA 389 Transerve Pty Ltd v Blue Ridge WA Pty Ltd [2015] FCA 953
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate