Federal Court of Australia
FEDERAL COURT OF AUSTRALIA
SZTFS v Minister for Immigration and Border Protection [2015] FCA 1227 Citation: SZTFS v Minister for Immigration and Border Protection [2015] FCA 1227
Parties: SZTFS v MINISTER FOR IMMIGRATION AND BORDER PROTECTION and DEPARTMENT OF IMMIGRATION AND CITIZENSHIP
File number: ACD 116 of 2015
Judge: JAGOT J
Date of judgment: 10 November 2015
Catchwords: PRACTICE AND PROCEDURE – whether interlocutory injunction should be granted – no substantive relief raising a serious question to be tried – application dismissed
Legislation: Migration Act 1958 (Cth) s 476A
Date of hearing: 10 November 2015
Place: Sydney via video-link to Canberra
Division: GENERAL DIVISION
Category: Catchwords
Number of paragraphs: 7
Counsel for the Applicant: Ms M Barlow
Solicitor for the Respondents: Mr J Bird of Clayton Utz
IN THE FEDERAL COURT OF AUSTRALIA AUSTRALIAN CAPITAL TERRITORY DISTRICT REGISTRY GENERAL DIVISION ACD 116 of 2015
BETWEEN: SZTFS
Applicant
AND: MINISTER FOR IMMIGRATION AND BORDER PROTECTION
First Respondent
DEPARTMENT OF IMMIGRATION AND CITIZENSHIP
Second Respondent
JUDGE: JAGOT J DATE OF ORDER: 10 NOVEMBER 2015 WHERE MADE: SYDNEY via video-link to canberra
THE COURT ORDERS THAT:
1. The identity of the applicant be suppressed and the applicant be referred to only as SZTFS. 2. The application for interlocutory relief, identified in the originating application dated 27 October 2015, be dismissed. 3. The originating application, if not discontinued at an earlier time, be made returnable for directions at 9.15 am on 23 November 2015. 4. The applicant pay the respondents' costs of and in connection with the application for interlocutory relief, as agreed or taxed. Note: Entry of orders is dealt with in Rule 39.32 of the Federal Court Rules 2011.
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate