Federal Court of Australia
FEDERAL COURT OF AUSTRALIA
BBD15 v Bochner [2015] FCA 1230 Citation: BBD15 v Bochner [2015] FCA 1230
Parties: BBD15 v KATRINA BOCHNER
File number: SAD 294 of 2015
Judge: WHITE J
Date of judgment: 13 November 2015
Catchwords: ADMINISTRATIVE LAW – judicial review – decision of Registrar to refuse to accept for filing documents intended to commence proceedings – whether documents constituted an abuse of process – whether documents disclosed a cause of action within the Court's jurisdiction –whether decisions sought to be reviewed were "privative clause decisions" and thus not reviewable by the Federal Court of Australia – whether error of law – decision of Registrar affirmed
Legislation: Administrative Decisions (Judicial Review) Act 1977 (Cth) s 5 Constitution s 75 Federal Court of Australia Act 1976 (Cth) s 21 Federal Court Rules 2011 (Cth) r 2.26 Judiciary Act 1903 (Cth) s 39B Migration Act 1958 (Cth) ss 5, 5E, 474, 476A
Cases cited: Akpata v Minister for Immigration and Multicultural and Indigenous Affairs [2003] FCA 514 Akpata v Minister for Immigration and Multicultural and Indigenous Affairs [2004] FCAFC 65 Akpata v Minister for Immigration and Multicultural and Indigenous Affairs [2006] FCAFC 19 Combis v Jensen [2009] FCA 778; (2009) 179 FCR 150 S v Secretary, Department of Immigration and Multicultural and Indigenous Affairs [2005] FCA 549 Satchithanantham v National Australia Bank Ltd [2010] FCAFC 47; (2010) 268 ALR 222 SZSSJ v Minister for Immigration and Border Protection [2015] FCAFC 125 SZVCP v Minister for Immigration [2015] FCCA 2576 SZVCP v Minister for Immigration [2015] FCCA 2577 Walton v Gardiner [1993] HCA 77; (1993) 177 CLR 378 Williams v Spautz [1992] HCA 34; (1992) 174 CLR 509
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate