Federal Court of Australia
FEDERAL COURT OF AUSTRALIA
Cassegrain v Cassegrain [2015] FCA 1233 Citation: Cassegrain v Cassegrain [2015] FCA 1233
Parties: DENIS CASSEGRAIN, CATHERINE DUNN, PATRICK CASSEGRAIN and JOHN CASSEGRAIN v FELICITY CASSEGRAIN
File number: NSD 351 of 2015
Judge: ROBERTSON J
Date of judgment: 17 November 2015
Catchwords: BANKRUPTCY AND INSOLVENCY – application for a sequestration order based on judgment of the Supreme Court of New South Wales – whether bankruptcy court should "go behind" the judgment of the Supreme Court – hearing of proceedings directed to overturning the judgment relied on as the foundation for the bankruptcy proceedings pending in the Court of Appeal – whether those proceedings based on genuine and arguable grounds – Held: application for sequestration order adjourned until the determination of the proceedings in the Court of Appeal
Legislation: Bankruptcy Act 1966 (Cth) ss 33, 40, 43, 52 Civil Liability Act 2003 (NSW) s 34 Conveyancing Act 1919 (NSW) s 66G
Cases cited: Adamopoulos v Olympic Airways SA (1990) 95 ALR 525 Ahern v Deputy Commissioner of Taxation (Qld) (1987) 76 ALR 137 Cassegrain v Gerard Cassegrain & Co Pty Ltd [2015] HCA 2; 316 ALR 111 Cassegrain v Gerard Cassegrain & Co Pty Ltd (in liq) [2015] NSWSC 851 Cassegrain and Ors v Gerard Cassegrain & Co Pty Limited (in liq) [2014] NSWSC 411 Cassegrain and Ors v Gerard Cassegrain & Co Pty Ltd [2012] NSWSC 834; 264 FLR 392 Cassegrain v Gerard Cassegrain & Co Pty Ltd [2012] NSWSC 403; 88 ACSR 358 Corney v Brien [1972] HCA 5; 126 CLR 212 Council of the City of Sydney v Obeid [2013] FCA 149 Eykamp v Deputy Commissioner of Taxation [2010] FCA 797 Gerard Cassegrain & Co Pty Ltd (in liq) v Cassegrain [2013] NSWCA 455; 305 ALR 687 House v The King [1936] HCA 40; 55 CLR 499 ICM Agriculture Pty Ltd v Young [2009] FCA 1169; 260 ALR 515 Nolten v Groeneveld Australia Pty Ltd [2011] FCA 1494 Radich v Bank of New Zealand (1993) 45 FCR 101 Re Betts; Ex parte Betts [1897] 1 QB 50 Sarks v Cassegrain [2015] FCAFC 38; 321 ALR 28 Totev v Sfar [2006] FCA 470; 230 ALR 236 Xu v Wan Ze Property Development (Aust) Pty Ltd (in liq), Ren v Wan Ze Property Development (Aust) Pty Ltd (in liq) [2014 FCA 461; 315 ALR 523
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate