Federal Court of Australia
FEDERAL COURT OF AUSTRALIA
Peter v Northern Territory of Australia [2015] FCA 1238 Citation: Peter v Northern Territory of Australia [2015] FCA 1238
Parties: APRIL PETER, ISOBEL NOBLE, ROBERT PYRO, BANJAMIN GEORGE, PETER BRIAN JOHNSON, LEAH BROWN, LINDA MAWSON, COLLEEN CHARLIE, WILTON TIMOTHY AND DEREK CHARLES ON BEHALF OF THE WAJALIBI, THALMARRURRKI, BUJULINA, JULAJI, HOBBLECHAIN CREEK, JIMANYI, CAMEL CREEK, LIRRIJPINA, GOLD CREEK, JAJINGUJI, KUDIDIWALIA, JUNGALINA AND BINANDA ESTATE GROUPS v NORTHERN TERRITORY OF AUSTRALIA, ARMOUR ENERGY LIMITED and WOLLOGORANG CATTLE COMPANY PTY LTD
File number: NTD 25 of 2013
Judge: MANSFIELD J
Date of judgment: 24 November 2015
Catchwords: NATIVE TITLE – Consent Determination – requirements under s 87 of the Native Title Act 1993 (Cth) – agreement of parties
Legislation: Native Title Act 1993 (Cth) Native Title Amendment Act 2009 (Cth)
Cases cited: Lovett on behalf of the Gunditjmara People v State of Victoria [2007] FCA 474 Cox on behalf of the Yungngora People v State of Western Australia [2007] FCA 588 Munn for and on behalf of the Gunggari People v State of Queensland (2001) 115 FCR 109 Smith v State of Western Australia (2000) 104 FCR 494 King v Northern Territory of Australia (2007) 162 FCR 89
Date of hearing: 24 November 2015
Date of last submissions: 23 October 2015
Place: Borroloola
Division: GENERAL DIVISION
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate