Federal Court of Australia
FEDERAL COURT OF AUSTRALIA
ALQ15 v Minister for Immigration and Border Protection [2015] FCA 1253 Citation: ALQ15 v Minister for Immigration and Border Protection [2015] FCA 1253
Appeal from: ALQ15 v Minister for Immigration and Border Protection & Anor [2015] FCCA 1704
Parties: ALQ15 v MINISTER FOR IMMIGRATION AND BORDER PROTECTION AND ADMINISTRATIVE APPEALS TRIBUNAL
File number(s): NSD 761 of 2015
Judge(s): LOGAN J
Date of judgment: 4 November 2015
Catchwords: MIGRATION – procedural fairness – appeal from a decision of the Federal Circuit Court affirming a decision of the Refugee Review Tribunal (Tribunal) to uphold the Minister's refusal to grant the appellant's protection visa application – where Tribunal's reasons referred to country information report by the Department of Foreign Affairs and Trade (DFAT) which was re-issued after hearing – appellant claimed Tribunal failed to comply with s 425 of the Migration Act 1958 (Cth) by not inviting him to comment on DFAT report – whether the appellant was given the opportunity to give evidence and present arguments in relation to the issues arising in relation to the decision under review Held: Tribunal part of an administrative decision-making continuum which commenced with the appellant's visa application – DFAT report did not raise new issue but rather one which had emerged in the continuum and which appellant had been given opportunity to address – no breach of s 425 – appeal dismissed
Legislation: Migration Act 1958 (Cth) ss 46A, 424, 425
Cases cited: ALQ15 v Minister for Immigration & Anor [2015] FCCA 1704 cited Jebb v Repatriation Commission (1988) 80 ALR 329 applied SZBEL v Minister for Immigration and Multicultural and Indigenous Affairs (2006) 228 CLR 152 cited
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate