Federal Court of Australia
FEDERAL COURT OF AUSTRALIA
Mathews v State of Queensland [2015] FCA 1264 Citation: Mathews v State of Queensland [2015] FCA 1264
Parties: RUSSELL GORDON HAIG MATHEWS v STATE OF QUEENSLAND and LIZBETH JORDAN
File number: QUD 1006 of 2015
Judge: COLLIER J
Date of judgment: 17 November 2015
Catchwords: PRACTICE AND PROCEDURE – alleged apprehended bias – no proper grounds for disqualification exist
Legislation: Australian Human Rights Commission Act 1986 (Cth) s 46PH(1)(i) Federal Court Rules 2011 rr 5.22(c), 30.22
Cases cited: Picos v Servcorp Limited [2015] FCA 344 Re J.R.L.; ex parte C.J.L. (1986) 161 CLR 342
Date of hearing: 17 November 2015
Place: Brisbane
Division: GENERAL DIVISION
Category: Catchwords
Number of paragraphs: 14
Counsel for the Applicant: The Applicant did not appear
Counsel for the First and Second Respondents: The First and Second Respondents did not appear
IN THE FEDERAL COURT OF AUSTRALIA QUEENSLAND DISTRICT REGISTRY GENERAL DIVISION QUD 1006 of 2015
BETWEEN: RUSSELL GORDON HAIG MATHEWS
Applicant
AND: STATE OF QUEENSLAND
First Respondent
LIZBETH JORDAN
Second Respondent
JUDGE: COLLIER J DATE OF ORDER: 17 NOVEMBER 2015 WHERE MADE: BRISBANE
THE COURT ORDERS THAT:
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate