Federal Court of Australia
FEDERAL COURT OF AUSTRALIA
Commonwealth of Australia v Shenzhen Energy Transport Co Ltd (No 2) [2015] FCA 1273 Citation: Commonwealth of Australia v Shenzhen Energy Transport Co Ltd (No 2) [2015] FCA 1273
Parties: COMMONWEALTH OF AUSTRALIA v SHENZHEN ENERGY TRANSPORT CO LTD
File number(s): QUD 178 of 2013
Judge(s): GREENWOOD J
Date of judgment: 18 November 2015
Catchwords: ADMIRALTY – consideration of an application for leave to amend the reply of the Commonwealth of Australia in the proceeding
Legislation: Admiralty Act 1988 (Cth), s 25
Other materials: Convention on Limitation of Liability for Maritime Claims 1976, Article 2(1)(a), (f); Articles 6, 9 and 10
Cases cited: Commonwealth of Australia v Shenzhen Energy Transport Co Ltd [2015] FCAFC 116 – cited and quoted AON Risk Services Australia Limited v Australian National University (2009) 239 CLR 175 – cited
Date of hearing: 12 November 2015
Date of orders: 16 November 2015
Place: Brisbane
Division: GENERAL DIVISION
Category: Catchwords
Number of paragraphs: 71
Counsel for the Applicant: Mr M Scott QC and Mr C Young
Solicitor for the Applicant: Australian Government Solicitor
Counsel for the Respondent: Mr J Sexton SC
Solicitor for the Respondent: Thynne & Macartney
IN THE FEDERAL COURT OF AUSTRALIA QUEENSLAND DISTRICT REGISTRY GENERAL DIVISION QUD 178 of 2013
BETWEEN: COMMONWEALTH OF AUSTRALIA
Applicant
AND: SHENZHEN ENERGY TRANSPORT CO LTD
Respondent
JUDGE: GREENWOOD J DATE OF ORDER: 16 NOVEMBER 2015 WHERE MADE: BRISBANE
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate