Federal Court of Australia
FEDERAL COURT OF AUSTRALIA
Ye v Zeng (No 3) [2015] FCA 1279 Citation: Ye v Zeng (No 3) [2015] FCA 1279
Parties: JOHNSON YE v ZENG RONGHUO ALSO KNOWN AS ANDREW TSANG, CHUNXIANG ZENG, QINGLONG ZENG, RONGXING ZENG, FUJIAN XIANGRONG CONSTRUCTION GROUP CO LTD and FUJIAN XIANGRONG DAQINSHAN TEA INDUSTRY DEVELOPMENT CO LTD
File number(s): NSD 1123 of 2015
Judge(s): ALLSOP CJ
Date of judgment: 17 November 2015
Legislation: International Arbitration Act 1974 (Cth)
Cases cited: Ye v Zeng [2015] FCA 1192 Ye v Zeng (No 2) [2015] FCA 1243
Date of hearing: 17 November 2015
Place: Sydney
Division: GENERAL DIVISION
Category: No Catchwords
Number of paragraphs: 6
Counsel for the Applicant: Mr P E King
Solicitor for the Applicant: Zhang Shijing Lawyers
Counsel for the Respondents: Mr T Lynch
Solicitor for the Respondents: Kl International Lawyers
IN THE FEDERAL COURT OF AUSTRALIA NEW SOUTH WALES DISTRICT REGISTRY GENERAL DIVISION NSD 1123 of 2015
BETWEEN: JOHNSON YE
Applicant
AND: ZENG RONGHUO ALSO KNOWN AS ANDREW TSANG
First Respondent
CHUNXIANG ZENG
Second Respondent
QINGLONG ZENG
Third Respondent
RONGXING ZENG
Fourth Respondent
FUJIAN XIANGRONG CONSTRUCTION GROUP CO LTD
Fifth Respondent
FUJIAN XIANGRONG DAQINSHAN TEA INDUSTRY DEVELOPMENT CO LTD
Sixth Respondent
JUDGE: ALLSOP CJ DATE OF ORDER: 17 NOVEMBER 2015 WHERE MADE: SYDNEY
ON THE APPLICANT, BY HIS COUNSEL, GIVING THE USUAL UNDERTAKING AS TO DAMAGES, THE COURT ORDERS THAT, UNTIL FURTHER ORDER: 1. Subject to compliance with these orders, in particular the provision of any mortgage or mortgages referred to in Order 2 below, each of the first to sixth respondents not sell, encumber, or otherwise deal with, in any way whatsoever, including by the obtaining of additional funding under any relevant facility, other than by the accrual of interest in the ordinary course of business, any of the following properties: (a) 3/507 Pacific Highway, Killara (Folio #3/SP86801); (b) 36/507 Pacific Highway, Killara (Folio #36/SP86801); (c) 39 Stanhope Road, Killara (Folio #1/551876); (d) 39A Stanhope Road, Killara (Folio #2/551876); (e) 109 Pitt St, Sydney (Folio #99/SP72095 & #100/SP72095); (f) 73 and 74 Belssel St, Belconnen, ACT; (g) such interest of any kind as each may have in the Xiang Rong Management Trust or any other trust or legal structure or entity over 7 Help St, Chatswood; and (h) such interest of any kind as each may have in the property at 7 Help St, Chatswood. 2. Stand over proceedings for recognition and enforcement to Friday 11 December 2015 at 9:30am on condition that the respondents on or before Friday 20 November 2015 execute, in registrable form, a mortgage or mortgages over the properties in 1(a)-(f) above and deliver same to the applicant. The applicant, as mortgagee, be at liberty to lodge a caveat or caveats in support of said mortgage or mortgages, but not, without leave of the court, to lodge said mortgage or mortgages for registration, up to Friday 11 December 2015. 3. Should the respondents fail to execute and deliver said mortgage or mortgages in registrable form by Friday 20 November 2015, the applicant have leave to move the Court on Monday 23 November 2015 at 9:30am for the entry of judgment for the full sum of the arbitration award, subject to conditions as to enforcement to be made by the Court. 4. Liberty to apply on 24 hours' notice. 5. The Court notes that there is no dispute that the award sum, at an appropriate exchange rate, is AUD $11,189,363.60, as at 13 November 2015, with daily accrual of post-award interest of AUD$1992.67. 6. The respondents to pay the costs of the application for recognition and enforcement to date, on a party-party basis. 7. Reserve to the applicant the right to argue that the question of the costs in Order 6 should be on an indemnity basis. Note: Entry of orders is dealt with in Rule 39.32 of the Federal Court Rules 2011.
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate