Federal Court of Australia
FEDERAL COURT OF AUSTRALIA
Dahler v Australian Capital Territory [2015] FCA 1303 Citation: Dahler v Australian Capital Territory [2015] FCA 1303
Appeal from: Dahler v Australian Capital Territory & Anor (No 2) [2015] FCCA 845
Parties: CLINTON DAHLER v AUSTRALIAN CAPITAL TERRITORY and MINISTER FOR DISABILITY, CHILDREN & YOUNG PEOPLE (ACT)
File number: NSD 724 of 2015
Judge: PERRY J
Date of judgment: 23 November 2015
Catchwords: PRACTICE AND PROCEDURE – whether appeal should be heard and determined by a Full Court – no issue of principle
Legislation: Fair Work Act 2009 (Cth), ss 341, 362 Federal Court of Australia Act 1976 (Cth), ss 25(1AA), 37N, 37M
Cases cited: Dahler v Australian Capital Territory & Anor (No 2) [2015] FCCA 845; (2015) 296 FLR 363 Fair Work Ombudsman v Toyota Material Handling (NSW) Pty Limited [2012] FCA 347 Khiani v Australian Bureau of Statistics [2011] FCAFC 109
Date of hearing: 23 November 2015
Place: Sydney by video-link to Canberra
Division: FAIR WORK DIVISION
Category: Catchwords
Number of paragraphs: 11
Counsel for the Appellant: Ms J Keys
Counsel for the Respondents: Mr D Jarvis
Solicitor for the Respondents: ACT Government Solicitor
IN THE FEDERAL COURT OF AUSTRALIA NEW SOUTH WALES DISTRICT REGISTRY FAIR WORK DIVISION NSD 724 of 2015
ON APPEAL FROM THE FEDERAL CIRCUIT COURT OF AUSTRALIA
BETWEEN: CLINTON DAHLER
Appellant
AND: AUSTRALIAN CAPITAL TERRITORY
First Respondent
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate