Federal Court of Australia
FEDERAL COURT OF AUSTRALIA
Islam v Minister for Immigration and Border Protection [2015] FCA 1417 Citation: Islam v Minister for Immigration and Border Protection [2015] FCA 1417
Appeal from: Islam v Minister for Immigration & Anor [2015] FCCA 1917
Parties: MOHAMMAD MOINUL ISLAM v MINISTER FOR IMMIGRATION AND BORDER PROTECTION and MIGRATION REVIEW TRIBUNAL
File number: NSD 915 of 2015
Judge: KATZMANN J
Date of judgment: 14 December 2015
Catchwords: MIGRATION – judicial review – Migration Review Tribunal – Skilled (Residence) (Class VB) visa – bogus document provided in order to satisfy the criterion of competent English – public interest criterion 4020 – Tribunal not satisfied that grounds for waiver had been made out – applicant failed to appear at hearing in Federal Circuit Court – primary judge proceeded to hear and determine the application in his absence – whether to do so constituted a denial of procedural fairness
Legislation: Federal Circuit Court Rules 2001 (Cth) rr 13.03C(1)(c), 16.05(2)(a) Migration Act 1958 (Cth) ss 65, 97 Migration Amendment Regulation 2011 (No 3) (Cth), sch 1 item [2]
Cases cited: Berenguel v Minister for Immigration and Citizenship [2010] HCA 8; 264 ALR 417 Ebner v Official Trustee in Bankruptcy (2000) 205 CLR 337 Milanes v Minister for Immigration and Border Protection [2015] FCA 1105 Minister for Immigration and Citizenship v Li (2013) 249 CLR 332 Minister for Immigration and Multicultural Affairs v Bhardwaj (2002) 209 CLR 597 Minister for Immigration and Multicultural Affairs v Jia (2001) 205 CLR 507 Minister for Immigration v Singh [2014] FCAFC 1, 308 ALR 280 SLMB v Minister for Immigration & Multicultural & Indigenous Affairs [2004] FCAFC 129 Sullivan v Department of Transport (1978) 20 ALR 323; 1 ALD 383
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate