Federal Court of Australia
FEDERAL COURT OF AUSTRALIA
AMA15 v Minister for Immigration and Border Protection [2015] FCA 1424 Citation: AMA15 v Minister for Immigration and Border Protection [2015] FCA 1424
Appeal from: AMA15 v Minister for Immigration & Anor [2015] FCCA 1954
Parties: AMA15 v MINISTER FOR IMMIGRATION AND BORDER PROTECTION and ADMINISTRATIVE APPEALS TRIBUNAL
File number: NSD 912 of 2015
Judge: MARKOVIC J
Date of judgment: 15 December 2015
Catchwords: MIGRATION – appeal from decision of the Federal Circuit Court of Australia – whether Tribunal fell into jurisdictional error in not considering applicant's application under s 36(2)(a) where the application was limited to the complementary protection criterion in circumstances where the delegate had considered the application under both criteria – no jurisdictional error – Tribunal correctly confined the exercise of its powers and discretions under the Migration Act 1958 (Cth)
Legislation: Migration Act 1958 (Cth) ss 36(2)(a), 36(2)(aa)
Cases cited: Minister for Immigration v Li (2013) 249 CLR 332 SLMB v Minister for Immigration and Multicultural and Indigenous Affairs [2004] FCAFC 129 SZGIZ v Minister for Immigration and Citizenship (2013) 212 FCR 235 SZVCH v Minster for Immigration and Border Protection [2015] FCCA 2950 SZVGG v Minister for Immigration and Border Protection [2015] FCCA 405 SZVGG v Minster for Immigration and Border Protection [2015] FCA 859 VAAC v Minister for Immigration and Multicultural and Indigenous Affairs (2003) 129 FCR 168 VUAX v Minister for Immigration and Multicultural and Indigenous Affairs [2004] FCAFC 158 WZAVA v Minster for Immigration and Border Protection [2015] FCCA 1454
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate