Federal Court of Australia
FEDERAL COURT OF AUSTRALIA
Potier v Hannigan [2015] FCA 1445 Citation: Potier v Hannigan [2015] FCA 1445
Parties: MALCOLM HUNTLEY POTIER v REGISTRAR PADDY HANNIGAN, MINISTER FOR IMMIGRATION AND BORDER PROTECTION and THE RESPONSIBLE OFFICER: ADMINISTRATIVE APPEALS TRIBUNAL
File number: NSD 1558 of 2015
Judge: MARKOVIC J
Date of judgment: 14 December 2015
Catchwords: MIGRATION – application for review of the decision of a registrar of the Federal Court of Australia – injunctive relief to prevent removal from Australia – original jurisdiction of the Federal Court of Australia in respect of a migration decision – no serious question to be tried – no utility in granting relief where the Court lacks jurisdiction
Legislation: Federal Court of Australia Act 1976 (Cth) s 23 Migration Act 1958 (Cth) ss 347, 412, 476, 476A Migration Regulations 1994
Cases cited: Pomare v Minister for Immigration and Citizenship [2008] FCA 458 Salehi v Minister for Immigration and Multicultural Affairs [2001] FCA 995
Date of hearing: 14 December 2015
Place: Sydney
Division: GENERAL DIVISION
Category: Catchwords
Number of paragraphs: 21
Counsel for the Applicant: The applicant appeared in person
Solicitor for the Applicant: Mr A Markus and Ms L Buchanan of Australian Government Solicitor
IN THE FEDERAL COURT OF AUSTRALIA NEW SOUTH WALES DISTRICT REGISTRY GENERAL DIVISION NSD 1558 of 2015
BETWEEN: MALCOLM HUNTLEY POTIER
Applicant
AND: REGISTRAR PADDY HANNIGAN
First Respondent
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate