Federal Court of Australia
FEDERAL COURT OF AUSTRALIA
Finch v The Heat Group Pty Ltd (No 4) [2015] FCA 1450 Citation: Finch v The Heat Group Pty Ltd (No 4) [2015] FCA 1450
Parties: JO-ANNE FINCH v THE HEAT GROUP PTY LTD (ACN 092 941 430), GILLIAN FRANKLIN, PETER KADLECIK, ADAM WHITE, JOHN SIMCOCKS and DARREN SCOTTI
File number: VID 704 of 2012
Judge: JESSUP J
Date of judgment: 14 December 2015
Legislation: Constitution Federal Court of Australia Act 1976 (Cth) ss 37M, 37N
Date of hearing: 14 December 2015
Place: Melbourne
Division: GENERAL DIVISION
Category: No Catchwords
Number of paragraphs: 5
Counsel for the Applicant: The applicant appeared in person
Counsel for the Respondents: Mr M Felman
Solicitor for the Respondents: Minter Ellison
IN THE FEDERAL COURT OF AUSTRALIA VICTORIA DISTRICT REGISTRY GENERAL DIVISION VID 704 of 2012
BETWEEN: JO-ANNE FINCH
Applicant
AND: THE HEAT GROUP PTY LTD (ACN 092 941 430)
First Respondent
GILLIAN FRANKLIN
Second Respondent
PETER KADLECIK
Third Respondent
ADAM WHITE
Fourth Respondent
JOHN SIMCOCKS
Fifth Respondent
DARREN SCOTTI
Sixth Respondent
JUDGE: JESSUP J DATE OF ORDER: 14 DECEMBER 2015 WHERE MADE: MELBOURNE
THE COURT ORDERS THAT:
1. The relief sought in paragraph 3 of the applicant's interlocutory application dated 19 April 2015 be refused. Note: Entry of orders is dealt with in Rule 39.32 of the Federal Court Rules 2011.
IN THE FEDERAL COURT OF AUSTRALIA VICTORIA DISTRICT REGISTRY GENERAL DIVISION VID 704 of 2012
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate