Federal Court of Australia
FEDERAL COURT OF AUSTRALIA
Potier v Hannigan (No 2) [2015] FCA 1455 Citation: Potier v Hannigan (No 2) [2015] FCA 1455
Parties: MALCOLM HUNTLEY POTIER v REGISTRAR PADDY HANNIGAN, MINISTER FOR IMMIGRATION AND BORDER PROTECTION and THE RESPONSIBLE OFFICER: ADMINISTRATIVE APPEALS TRIBUNAL
File number: NSD 1558 of 2015
Judge: MARKOVIC J
Date of judgment: 17 December 2015
Legislation: Federal Court Rules 2011 r 5.23(1)(b)(i)
Date of hearing: 17 December 2015
Place: Sydney
Division: GENERAL DIVISION
Category: No Catchwords
Number of paragraphs: 2
Counsel for the Applicant: The applicant did not appear
Solicitor for the Respondents: Mr A Markus of Australian Government Solicitor
IN THE FEDERAL COURT OF AUSTRALIA NEW SOUTH WALES DISTRICT REGISTRY GENERAL DIVISION NSD 1558 of 2015
BETWEEN: MALCOLM HUNTLEY POTIER
Applicant
AND: REGISTRAR PADDY HANNIGAN
First Respondent
MINISTER FOR IMMIGRATION AND BORDER PROTECTION
Second Respondent
THE RESPONSIBLE OFFICER: ADMINISTRATIVE APPEALS TRIBUNAL
Third Respondent
JUDGE: MARKOVIC J DATE OF ORDER: 17 DECEMBER 2015 WHERE MADE: SYDNEY
THE COURT ORDERS THAT:
1. Pursuant to r 5.23(1)(b)(i) of the Federal Court Rules 2011, the proceedings be dismissed immediately. 2. The applicant pay the second respondent's costs of the proceedings Note: Entry of orders is dealt with in Rule 39.32 of the Federal Court Rules 2011.
IN THE FEDERAL COURT OF AUSTRALIA NEW SOUTH WALES DISTRICT REGISTRY GENERAL DIVISION NSD 1558 of 2015
BETWEEN: MALCOLM HUNTLEY POTIER
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate