Federal Court of Australia
FEDERAL COURT OF AUSTRALIA
Gaynor v Chief of the Defence Force (No 4) [2015] FCA 1461 Citation: Gaynor v Chief of the Defence Force (No 4) [2015] FCA 1461
Parties: BERNARD GAYNOR v CHIEF OF THE DEFENCE FORCE
File number(s): NSD 692 of 2014
Judge(s): BUCHANAN J
Date of judgment: 18 December 2015
Legislation: Administrative Decisions (Judicial Review) Act 1977 (Cth)
Cases cited: Bowen Investments Pty Ltd v Tabcorp Holdings Ltd (No 2) [2008] FCAFC 107 Gaynor v Chief of the Defence Force (No 3) [2015] FCA 1370 Ruddock v Vadarlis (No 2) (2001) 115 FCR 229
Date of hearing: Heard on the papers
Date of last submissions: 15 December 2015 (Respondent) 18 December 2015 (Applicant)
Place: Sydney
Division: GENERAL DIVISION
Category: No Catchwords
Number of paragraphs: 14
Solicitor for the Applicant: Mr R Balzola of Robert Balzola & Associates
Counsel for the Respondent: Mr J Kirk SC with Mr D Robertson
Solicitor for the Respondent: Clayton Utz
IN THE FEDERAL COURT OF AUSTRALIA NEW SOUTH WALES DISTRICT REGISTRY GENERAL DIVISION NSD 692 of 2014
BETWEEN: BERNARD GAYNOR
Applicant
AND: CHIEF OF THE DEFENCE FORCE
Respondent
JUDGE: BUCHANAN J DATE OF ORDER: 18 DECEMBER 2015 WHERE MADE: SYDNEY
THE COURT ORDERS THAT:
1. Order 4 made on 4 December 2015 is vacated. 2. Except as hereafter provided, the respondent is to pay 50% of the applicant's costs of the proceedings, to be taxed if not agreed. 3. The applicant is to pay the respondent's costs of the interlocutory application filed on 15 December 2015, to be taxed if not agreed. 4. The respondent is to pay the applicant's costs of the directions hearing on 18 December 2015, to be taxed if not agreed. Note: Entry of orders is dealt with in Rule 39.32 of the Federal Court Rules 2011.
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate