Federal Court of Australia
FEDERAL COURT OF AUSTRALIA
Health Services Union v Jackson (No 5) [2015] FCA 1467 Citation: Health Services Union v Jackson (No 5) [2015] FCA 1467
Parties: HEALTH SERVICES UNION v KATHERINE JACKSON; KATHERINE JACKSON v HEALTH SERVICES UNION ROBERT ELLIOTT v HEALTH SERVICES UNION; HEALTH SERVICES UNION v ROBERT ELLIOTT, MICHAEL WILLIAMSON AND KATHERINE JACKSON
File numbers: VID 1042 of 2013 NSD 1501 of 2013
Judge: TRACEY J
Date of judgment: 22 December 2015
Catchwords: INDUSTRIAL LAW – practice and procedure – application for pre-judgment interest – relevant considerations for award of interest – application for lump sum costs order – whether s 329(1) of the Fair Work (Registered Organisations) Act 2009 (Cth) constrained the Court's power to awards costs in proceedings brought under the Fair Work (Registered Organisations) Act 2009 (Cth) and the Corporations Act 2001 (Cth) – whether indemnity costs should be awarded where Calderbank offer made
Legislation: Bankruptcy Act 1966 (Cth) s 55 Building and Construction Industry Improvement Act 2005 (Cth) Corporations Act 2001 (Cth) s 1335(2) Fair Work Act 2009 (Cth) s 570(1) Fair Work (Registered Organisations) Act 2009 (Cth) s 329(1) Federal Court of Australia Act 1976 (Cth) ss 43, 51A(1)(a), 51A(2)(a) Human Rights and Equal Opportunity Commission Act 1986 (Cth) s 46PO(1) Racial Discrimination Act 1975 (Cth) Workplace Relations Act 1996 (Cth) ss 170CP(1), 170CS(1), 824
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate